Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 28, 2025·Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Philadelphia Flyers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 74% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT180519041226
PHI11011408022334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:19PITJustin BrazeauAssists: Anthony Mantha, Mathew Dumba · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:25PHIBobby BrinkPPAssists: Noah Cates, Trevor Zegras · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:46PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Sean Couturier, Bobby Brink · Snap, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P3 11:57PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Filip Hallander, Bryan Rust · Backhand, 0.00 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Travis Konecny stopped
  2. 2. PIT Bryan Rust stopped
  3. 3. PHI Matvei Michkov scored
  4. 4. PIT Evgeni Malkin scored
  5. 5. PHI Bobby Brink scored
  6. 6. PIT Ville Koivunen stopped
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 11:19PHIGarnet Hathaway: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 16:53PITMathew Dumba: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 0:37PHIBobby Brink: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 10:24PHICam York: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 19:24PITMathew Dumba: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 13:15PITEvgeni Malkin: Slashing2 min
  7. OT 0:49PHITrevor Zegras: Slashing2 min
  8. OT 3:14PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min
  9. OT 5:00PITSidney Crosby: Misconduct10 min
  10. OT 5:00PITRyan Shea: Misconduct10 min
  11. OT 5:00PITParker Wotherspoon: Misconduct10 min
  12. OT 5:00PHITrevor Zegras: Misconduct10 min
  13. OT 5:00PITNoel Acciari: Misconduct10 min
  14. OT 5:00PHITyson Foerster: Misconduct10 min
  15. OT 5:00PHIOwen Tippett: Misconduct10 min
  16. OT 5:00PHIJamie Drysdale: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cates won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITPHI
26Shots on goal34
2.1Expected goals3.6
53Shot attempts64
27Faceoffs won29
4Power plays4
48Penalty minutes48
15Hits20
12Blocked shots14
19Giveaways15
5Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Mantha – Brazeau11:34

    xG 0.34–0.27 (57%)attempts 8–11goals 1–0

  2. Novak – Koivunen – Kindel8:29

    xG 0.34–0.37 (48%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  3. Acciari – Dewar – Lizotte8:22

    xG 0.25–0.32 (44%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Crosby – Rust – Hallander13:08

    xG 0.24–1.05 (19%)attempts 14–16goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Letang – Karlsson2:02

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  2. Karlsson – Wotherspoon16:43

    xG 0.46–0.62 (43%)attempts 15–12goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Shea13:45

    xG 0.38–0.64 (37%)attempts 13–14goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCates – Brink – Foerster11:49

    xG 0.62–0.06 (91%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  2. Couturier – Konecny – Tippett10:49

    xG 0.28–0.25 (54%)attempts 12–6goals 0–1

  3. Dvorak – Zegras – Michkov10:32

    xG 0.61–0.68 (47%)attempts 14–16goals 0–1

  4. Deslauriers – Hathaway – Abols7:33

    xG 0.10–0.18 (36%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeeler – Drysdale16:24

    xG 0.94–0.37 (72%)attempts 24–14goals 0–0

  2. Sanheim – York18:06

    xG 0.46–0.13 (78%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

  3. Juulsen – Zamula8:55

    xG 0.21–0.58 (27%)attempts 5–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.6 xGPIT 2.1 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #495 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.90 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 74% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).