Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 30, 2025·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Calgary Flames 3, Ottawa Senators 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 71% of the time.

OTT winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CGY2110918010329
OTT11301028072438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:51CGYYegor SharangovichPPAssists: Joel Farabee, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:37OTTLars EllerSHAssists: Shane Pinto, Thomas Chabot · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:53CGYMatt CoronatoPPAssists: Morgan Frost, Rasmus Andersson · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–1
  4. P3 2:36OTTArtem ZubAssists: Lars Eller, Drake Batherson · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P3 8:16CGYNazem KadriAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau · Snap, 0.16 xG3–2
  6. P3 17:11OTTJake SandersonAssists: Tim Stützle, Jordan Spence · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. OTT Drake Batherson scored
  2. 2. CGY Justin Kirkland stopped
  3. 3. OTT Tim Stützle scored
  4. 4. CGY Morgan Frost stopped
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:23OTTRidly Greig: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  2. P1 9:33CGYKevin Bahl: Interference2 min
  3. P1 14:04OTTShane Pinto: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P1 19:22CGYAdam Klapka: Holding2 min
  5. P2 2:34OTTNick Jensen: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 3:50CGYMorgan Frost: Holding2 min
  7. P2 12:44CGYBlake Coleman: Interference2 min
  8. P2 12:44OTTNick Cousins: Embellishment2 min
  9. OT 2:30CGYRasmus Andersson: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
47% to win53% to win
← CGY attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pinto won the faceoff against Frost
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYOTT
29Shots on goal38
2.4Expected goals3.8
55Shot attempts64
24Faceoffs won46
4Power plays4
10Penalty minutes10
17Hits16
7Blocked shots21
19Giveaways23
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestKirkland – Lomberg – Klapka6:31

    xG 0.39–0.12 (76%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  2. Backlund – Coleman – Honzek8:58

    xG 0.29–0.32 (47%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  3. Kadri – Huberdeau – Frost10:09

    xG 0.24–0.48 (33%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  4. Farabee – Sharangovich – Coronato9:59

    xG 0.16–0.43 (26%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Hanley14:46

    xG 0.70–0.35 (67%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  2. Bean – Pachal10:52

    xG 0.48–0.26 (64%)attempts 10–9goals 1–1

  3. Andersson – Bahl14:30

    xG 0.21–0.75 (22%)attempts 14–16goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestCousins – Batherson – Stützle6:34

    xG 0.43–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Giroux – Amadio – Pinto8:44

    xG 0.37–0.24 (60%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  3. Perron – Cozens – Greig9:00

    xG 0.29–0.24 (55%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanderson – Zub12:11

    xG 0.41–0.25 (62%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  2. Spence – Kleven9:54

    xG 0.38–0.30 (56%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  3. Jensen – Chabot13:02

    xG 0.41–0.39 (51%)attempts 10–14goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 3.8 xGCGY 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #237 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.27 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 71% of the time.

OTT winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).