Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 1, 2025·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Colorado Avalanche 2, San Jose Sharks 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 88% of the time.

SJS winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
COL1151160701239
SJS16150913323

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:30COLMartin NecasAssists: Cale Makar, Devon Toews · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:21SJSMacklin CelebriniAssists: Tyler Toffoli, Shakir Mukhamadullin · Snap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:07SJSPhilipp KurashevAssists: Ty Dellandrea, John Klingberg · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:10COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Artturi Lehkonen, Valeri Nichushkin · Other, 1.00 xG2–2
  5. OT 1:48SJSPhilipp KurashevGWGAssists: Alexander Wennberg · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–3
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 5:55COLIlya Solovyov: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 13:09SJSJohn Klingberg: Interference2 min
  3. P2 4:50SJSMacklin Celebrini: Slashing2 min
  4. P3 3:07COLDevon Toews: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P3 7:13COLGabriel Landeskog: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win53% to win
← COL attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Wennberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLSJS
39Shots on goal23
4.4Expected goals1.9
74Shot attempts45
33Faceoffs won34
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
13Hits16
14Blocked shots10
18Giveaways18
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – Olofsson – Drury9:11

    xG 0.84–0.02 (98%)attempts 18–4goals 0–0

  2. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Necas14:46

    xG 0.78–0.47 (62%)attempts 15–14goals 1–1

  3. Nelson – Nichushkin – Colton9:38

    xG 0.43–0.25 (63%)attempts 14–6goals 0–1

  4. Kelly – Bardakov – Makar5:43

    xG 0.30–0.24 (56%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestManson – Solovyov3:31

    xG 1.24–0.02 (99%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  2. Toews – Makar13:30

    xG 0.72–0.33 (69%)attempts 14–9goals 1–2

  3. Solovyov – Malinski4:09

    xG 0.39–0.00 (100%)attempts 11–1goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. Toffoli – Smith – Celebrini14:02

    xG 0.33–0.62 (34%)attempts 9–15goals 1–0

  2. Goodrow – Giles – Dellandrea7:12

    xG 0.09–0.46 (17%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  3. Wennberg – Kurashev – Eklund12:56

    xG 0.17–0.58 (23%)attempts 8–15goals 0–1

  4. Skinner – Graf – Misa6:32

    xG 0.15–1.52 (9%)attempts 4–17goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrlov – Mukhamadullin4:59

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  2. Orlov – Liljegren4:31

    xG 0.16–0.16 (51%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  3. Desharnais – Mukhamadullin5:13

    xG 0.14–0.18 (43%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 1.9 xGCOL 4.4 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 55/100 · #634 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.68 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 88% of the time.

SJS winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).