Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 1, 2025·Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia

Toronto Maple Leafs 5, Philadelphia Flyers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 57% of the time.

PHI winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR1621229527
PHI1707119233

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:09PHIChristian DvorakAssists: Nikita Grebenkin, Travis Konecny · Snap, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:16TORAuston MatthewsAssists: Morgan Rielly, Nick Robertson · Snap, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:14TORJake McCabeAssists: Chris Tanev, Matias Maccelli · Snap, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P2 17:34TORNick RobertsonGWGAssists: Matthew Knies, John Tavares · Snap, 0.10 xG3–1
  5. P3 0:33TOREaston CowanAssists: John Tavares · Snap, 0.06 xG4–1
  6. P3 16:08PHITyson FoersterPPAssists: Trevor Zegras, Matvei Michkov · Slap, 0.06 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:42TORCalle JarnkrokENAssists: Dakota Joshua, Simon Benoit · Wrist, 0.59 xG5–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 13:02PHITravis Konecny: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 13:02PHITravis Konecny: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P2 1:09TORJohn Tavares: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P2 12:53TORMax Domi: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 1:47TORCalle Jarnkrok: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 8:23PHIMatvei Michkov: Interference2 min
  7. P3 10:36TORJake McCabe: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 15:51TORSimon Benoit: Roughing2 min · PPG
  9. P3 17:22TOROliver Ekman-Larsson: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← TOR attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Matthews won the faceoff against Cates
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORPHI
27Shots on goal33
3.1Expected goals2.7
50Shot attempts72
39Faceoffs won29
3Power plays6
12Penalty minutes6
20Hits17
20Blocked shots11
15Giveaways17
0Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestMatthews – Robertson – Knies8:21

    xG 0.53–0.23 (70%)attempts 7–9goals 2–0

  2. Tavares – McMann – Cowan8:34

    xG 0.49–0.33 (60%)attempts 11–8goals 1–1

  3. Jarnkrok – Domi – Blais6:09

    xG 0.40–0.25 (61%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  4. Joshua – Roy – Maccelli7:44

    xG 0.18–0.33 (35%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTanev – McCabe8:01

    xG 1.00–0.19 (84%)attempts 14–4goals 3–0

  2. Rielly – Carlo10:43

    xG 0.49–0.12 (81%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  3. McCabe – Benoit3:08

    xG 0.23–0.03 (87%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCates – Brink – Foerster8:10

    xG 0.45–0.17 (73%)attempts 9–3goals 0–1

  2. Tippett – Zegras – Michkov7:33

    xG 0.25–0.30 (45%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

  3. Hathaway – Abols – Gaucher7:36

    xG 0.44–0.67 (40%)attempts 16–8goals 0–0

  4. Dvorak – Konecny – Grebenkin8:14

    xG 0.21–0.56 (27%)attempts 4–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJuulsen – Zamula10:34

    xG 0.51–0.41 (55%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

  2. Sanheim – York14:17

    xG 0.61–0.62 (50%)attempts 15–9goals 0–2

  3. Seeler – Drysdale11:49

    xG 0.29–0.79 (27%)attempts 9–21goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.7 xGTOR 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHITOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #684 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.98 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 57% of the time.

PHI winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).