Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 1, 2025·Grand Casino Arena, St. Paul

Vancouver Canucks 2, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 70% of the time.

MIN winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN04112112228
MIN1611438528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:53MINVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Matt Boldy · Backhand, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:34VANDrew O'ConnorAssists: Mackenzie MacEachern, Aatu Räty · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:49MINMarco RossiAssists: Marcus Johansson, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P3 4:07MINVinnie HinostrozaGWGAssists: Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 5:46MINJonas BrodinAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–4
  6. P3 7:00VANDrew O'ConnorAssists: Aatu Räty · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P3 16:43MINRyan HartmanENAssists: Vinnie Hinostroza · Slap, 0.21 xG2–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 10:42VANArshdeep Bains: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 15:14VANArshdeep Bains: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 16:35MINMarcus Foligno: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P2 15:03VANElias Pettersson: Interference2 min
  5. P2 0:00MINMarco Rossi: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 8:12VANEvander Kane: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 8:12MINMarcus Foligno: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 10:28VANEvander Kane: Misconduct10 min
  9. P3 10:28MINMarcus Foligno: Misconduct10 min
  10. P3 18:24MINYakov Trenin: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Pettersson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANMIN
28Shots on goal28
2.2Expected goals3.3
62Shot attempts58
28Faceoffs won29
3Power plays3
18Penalty minutes18
22Hits26
12Blocked shots15
14Giveaways11
2Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestMacEachern – O'Connor – Räty6:59

    xG 0.37–0.20 (66%)attempts 10–7goals 2–0

  2. Karlsson – Bains – Sasson5:50

    xG 0.17–0.28 (38%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Kane – Sherwood – Reichel5:35

    xG 0.43–0.60 (42%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  4. Boeser – DeBrusk – Pettersson8:26

    xG 0.16–0.50 (24%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPettersson – Willander12:44

    xG 0.35–0.21 (62%)attempts 15–9goals 0–1

  2. Hronek – Pettersson12:40

    xG 0.72–0.62 (54%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

  3. Pettersson – Hronek2:05

    xG 0.03–0.16 (16%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansson – Kaprizov – Rossi11:34

    xG 0.44–0.20 (68%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  2. Foligno – Hinostroza – Hartman6:52

    xG 0.31–0.12 (72%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Eriksson Ek – Kaprizov – Boldy2:32

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Pitlick – Trenin – Jones7:06

    xG 0.21–0.14 (60%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Middleton11:52

    xG 0.96–0.34 (74%)attempts 14–14goals 1–0

  2. Jiricek – Buium11:15

    xG 0.58–0.47 (55%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

  3. Brodin – Faber17:28

    xG 0.40–0.58 (41%)attempts 16–17goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.3 xGVAN 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #663 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.22 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 70% of the time.

MIN winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).