Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 4, 2025·Honda Center, Anaheim

Florida Panthers 3, Anaheim Ducks 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 62% of the time.

ANA winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA1921002321
ANA29210313732

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:09ANACutter GauthierAssists: Leo Carlsson · Snap, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:14FLABrad MarchandAssists: Jeff Petry · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:17ANACutter GauthierPPAssists: Troy Terry · Slap, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:21FLAEvan RodriguesAssists: Mackie Samoskevich, Gustav Forsling · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P2 10:37FLAEetu LuostarinenPPAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Sam Bennett · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–2
  6. P2 15:36ANACutter GauthierPPAssists: Jackson LaCombe, Leo Carlsson · Snap, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. P2 17:19ANANikita NesterenkoGWGAssists: Ryan Poehling, Alex Killorn · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–4
  8. P3 11:43ANAJacob TroubaAssists: Cutter Gauthier, Mason McTavish · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–5
  9. P3 13:21ANAChris KreiderAssists: Nikita Nesterenko, Troy Terry · Deflected, 0.14 xG3–6
  10. P3 14:47ANAJansen HarkinsUnassisted · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–7
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 7:18ANAChris Kreider: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 8:02FLABrad Marchand: Broken stick2 min
  3. P1 12:23FLAEetu Luostarinen: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 15:06FLACarter Verhaeghe: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 9:08ANAAlex Killorn: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P2 14:14FLAAnton Lundell: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P2 17:58ANAIan Moore: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P3 0:42FLAEetu Luostarinen: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 0:42FLAAnton Lundell: Cross checking2 min
  10. P3 0:42ANAMason McTavish: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 0:51ANALeo Carlsson: Interference5 min
  12. P3 0:51ANALeo Carlsson: Game misconduct10 min
  13. P3 4:16FLABrad Marchand: Hooking2 min
  14. P3 6:24ANAMason McTavish: High sticking2 min
  15. P3 17:42FLANiko Mikkola: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win53% to win
← FLA attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lundell won the faceoff against Carlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAANA
21Shots on goal32
2.5Expected goals3.3
48Shot attempts64
30Faceoffs won37
5Power plays7
16Penalty minutes25
27Hits13
17Blocked shots8
18Giveaways13
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestGreer – Gregor – Schwindt6:03

    xG 0.55–0.22 (71%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  2. Bennett – Boqvist – Samoskevich5:05

    xG 0.12–0.26 (32%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  3. Verhaeghe – Reinhart – Rodrigues6:46

    xG 0.28–0.50 (36%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

  4. Marchand – Luostarinen – Lundell8:30

    xG 0.29–0.62 (32%)attempts 7–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Sebrango12:17

    xG 1.04–0.76 (58%)attempts 17–14goals 1–1

  2. Jones – Mikkola10:59

    xG 0.12–0.58 (18%)attempts 7–14goals 0–1

  3. Ekblad – Forsling11:20

    xG 0.42–0.95 (30%)attempts 11–17goals 1–2

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestMcTavish – Gauthier – Sennecke6:43

    xG 0.81–0.26 (75%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Kreider – Terry – Carlsson7:29

    xG 0.48–0.23 (68%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – Poehling – Nesterenko7:18

    xG 0.52–0.34 (61%)attempts 13–7goals 1–0

  4. Johnston – Vatrano – Harkins7:29

    xG 0.29–0.47 (38%)attempts 4–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTrouba – Zellweger11:26

    xG 1.09–0.29 (79%)attempts 20–11goals 3–1

  2. Moore – Zellweger2:05

    xG 0.39–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Helleson – LaCombe9:44

    xG 0.35–0.23 (60%)attempts 10–6goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.3 xGFLA 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #235 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.96 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 62% of the time.

ANA winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).