Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 6, 2025·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Anaheim Ducks 7, Dallas Stars 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 60% of the time.

DAL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA0741137725
DAL2815213526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:49DALWyatt JohnstonPPAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Miro Heiskanen · Snap, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:18DALWyatt JohnstonPPAssists: Miro Heiskanen, Jason Robertson · Tip-in, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P2 1:16ANAChris KreiderPPAssists: Leo Carlsson · Snap, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 2:48ANAIan MooreAssists: Ryan Poehling, Nikita Nesterenko · Snap, 0.23 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:19DALTyler SeguinAssists: Sam Steel, Miro Heiskanen · Snap, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:07ANACutter GauthierAssists: Alex Killorn · Snap, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P2 17:05ANAOlen ZellwegerPPAssists: Beckett Sennecke, Alex Killorn · Snap, 0.15 xG4–3
  8. P3 0:16ANAChris KreiderAssists: Drew Helleson, Troy Terry · Tip-in, 0.08 xG5–3
  9. P3 1:50DALMikko RantanenPPAssists: Wyatt Johnston, Jason Robertson · Snap, 0.23 xG5–4
  10. P3 9:22ANALeo CarlssonSHGWGAssists: Troy Terry · Slap, 0.18 xG6–4
  11. P3 16:39DALRoope HintzAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Miro Heiskanen · Deflected, 0.12 xG6–5
  12. P3 18:07ANAMason McTavishENAssists: Beckett Sennecke, Cutter Gauthier · Snap, 0.82 xG7–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 4:40ANANikita Nesterenko: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:00DALRadek Faksa: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 16:08ANAIan Moore: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 19:24DALSam Steel: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 15:16DALAlexander Petrovic: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 1:44ANAJacob Trouba: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 2:53ANAMason McTavish: Elbowing2 min
  8. P3 4:32DALMikko Rantanen: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 8:05ANAIan Moore: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 19:04DALMiro Heiskanen: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Carlsson won the faceoff against Seguin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANADAL
25Shots on goal26
3.6Expected goals3.0
61Shot attempts42
24Faceoffs won35
5Power plays5
10Penalty minutes10
22Hits15
10Blocked shots19
10Giveaways17
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Poehling – Nesterenko6:45

    xG 0.36–0.14 (71%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0

  2. Kreider – Terry – Carlsson10:36

    xG 0.28–0.24 (54%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  3. Johnston – Vatrano – Harkins7:07

    xG 0.29–0.26 (53%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  4. McTavish – Gauthier – Sennecke8:29

    xG 0.27–0.26 (51%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMoore – Mintyukov8:13

    xG 0.80–0.19 (81%)attempts 9–3goals 1–1

  2. Trouba – Zellweger12:52

    xG 0.50–0.30 (63%)attempts 15–6goals 1–0

  3. Helleson – LaCombe14:42

    xG 0.35–0.52 (40%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestBlackwell – Faksa – Erne4:07

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Rantanen – Robertson – Johnston3:07

    xG 0.33–0.16 (68%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Bäck – Bourque – Hryckowian4:22

    xG 0.04–0.11 (26%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Seguin – Hintz – Robertson6:47

    xG 0.25–0.41 (38%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Petrovic – Harley2:07

    xG 0.09–0.05 (63%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Lindell – Lyubushkin2:29

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Lyubushkin – Harley10:25

    xG 0.27–0.28 (49%)attempts 5–15goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 3.0 xGANA 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #29 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.51 · 12 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 60% of the time.

DAL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).