Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 8, 2025·Lenovo Center, Raleigh

Buffalo Sabres 3, Carolina Hurricanes 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 76% of the time.

CAR winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF1605211322
CAR110215310635

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:00CARSebastian AhoAssists: Andrei Svechnikov · Snap, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:18BUFOwen PowerAssists: Noah Ostlund · Snap, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:34CARAndrei SvechnikovPPAssists: K'Andre Miller, Nikolaj Ehlers · Slap, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:39CARJesperi KotkaniemiAssists: Joel Nystrom, Taylor Hall · Slap, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 0:29CAREric RobinsonGWGAssists: Jesperi Kotkaniemi, Charles Alexis Legault · Snap, 0.08 xG1–4
  6. P3 3:23BUFAlex TuchAssists: Tage Thompson · Snap, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P3 6:49BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Ryan McLeod, Alex Tuch · Snap, 0.14 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:56CARSeth JarvisENAssists: Jordan Staal · Snap, 0.72 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:32CARCharles Alexis LegaultENAssists: Sebastian Aho · Snap, 0.25 xG3–6
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 11:07BUFJacob Bryson: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 2:59BUFConor Timmins: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 11:59CARMike Reilly: Holding the stick2 min
  4. P2 18:08CARCharles Alexis Legault: Interference2 min
  5. P2 18:08BUFJordan Greenway: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kotkaniemi won the faceoff against Krebs
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCAR
22Shots on goal35
2.4Expected goals4.0
50Shot attempts72
31Faceoffs won33
1Power plays2
6Penalty minutes4
21Hits25
16Blocked shots14
25Giveaways24
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestTuch – Thompson – McLeod12:53

    xG 0.87–0.44 (66%)attempts 11–13goals 2–1

  2. Greenway – Doan – Kozak10:17

    xG 0.49–0.41 (55%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  3. Krebs – Quinn – Rosen4:22

    xG 0.15–0.13 (54%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Malenstyn – Krebs – Dunne6:48

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSamuelsson – Power4:52

    xG 0.34–0.24 (59%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Bryson – Samuelsson10:10

    xG 0.17–0.10 (62%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  3. Timmins – Power11:34

    xG 0.46–0.49 (48%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestAho – Svechnikov – Jarvis12:36

    xG 0.70–0.42 (63%)attempts 17–12goals 1–1

  2. Staal – Martinook – Carrier10:16

    xG 0.54–0.34 (62%)attempts 12–7goals 0–2

  3. Ehlers – Stankoven – Blake8:23

    xG 0.20–0.15 (56%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  4. Hall – Robinson – Kotkaniemi10:07

    xG 0.39–0.57 (41%)attempts 11–11goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestReilly – Legault16:00

    xG 0.57–0.30 (65%)attempts 11–14goals 0–0

  2. Nikishin – Nystrom14:17

    xG 0.61–0.75 (45%)attempts 21–11goals 1–1

  3. Walker – Miller14:10

    xG 0.35–0.59 (37%)attempts 14–11goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 4.0 xGBUF 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #292 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.28 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 76% of the time.

CAR winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).