Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 8, 2025·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Florida Panthers 1, San Jose Sharks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 60% of the time.

SJS winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA06120013139
SJS1141316323

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:25SJSMacklin CelebriniAssists: Will Smith, Vincent Desharnais · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:06SJSAdam GaudetteGWGAssists: Dmitry Orlov, Timothy Liljegren · Tip-in, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:34FLABrad MarchandAssists: Anton Lundell, Eetu Luostarinen · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P3 19:09SJSAlexander WennbergENAssists: Collin Graf, Will Smith · Wrist, 0.75 xG1–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 10:03FLANoah Gregor: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 15:19SJSJeff Skinner: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 18:17SJSPhilipp Kurashev: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 13:28SJSRyan Reaves: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 15:18SJSAlexander Wennberg: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 11:39SJSMacklin Celebrini: Holding2 min
  7. P3 14:12FLASam Bennett: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win53% to win
← FLA attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lundell won the faceoff against Wennberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLASJS
39Shots on goal23
3.5Expected goals2.9
78Shot attempts43
32Faceoffs won27
5Power plays2
4Penalty minutes10
23Hits17
11Blocked shots18
15Giveaways13
7Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestMarchand – Luostarinen – Lundell9:27

    xG 0.45–0.02 (96%)attempts 15–6goals 1–0

  2. Verhaeghe – Reinhart – Rodrigues10:37

    xG 0.66–0.30 (69%)attempts 19–6goals 0–0

  3. Bennett – Boqvist – Samoskevich9:04

    xG 0.37–0.19 (66%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  4. Greer – Gregor – Schwindt7:09

    xG 0.06–0.18 (25%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJones – Mikkola15:52

    xG 0.74–0.38 (66%)attempts 25–12goals 1–1

  2. Ekblad – Forsling13:31

    xG 0.51–0.33 (61%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

  3. Petry – Sebrango10:56

    xG 0.27–0.20 (58%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestReaves – Goodrow – Gaudette5:54

    xG 0.38–0.11 (78%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Toffoli – Smith – Celebrini10:25

    xG 0.43–0.23 (65%)attempts 8–13goals 1–0

  3. Skinner – Dellandrea – Cardwell7:59

    xG 0.25–0.20 (56%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Wennberg – Kurashev – Graf8:36

    xG 0.00–0.41 (1%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDesharnais – Dickinson10:57

    xG 0.50–0.29 (63%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  2. Klingberg – Ferraro13:10

    xG 0.29–0.56 (34%)attempts 8–15goals 0–0

  3. Orlov – Liljegren11:34

    xG 0.13–0.43 (24%)attempts 5–16goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.9 xGFLA 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 19/100 · #1121 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.98 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 60% of the time.

SJS winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).