Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 13, 2025·Little Caesars Arena, Detroit

Anaheim Ducks 3, Detroit Red Wings 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 58% of the time.

DET winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA01027111328
DET01031637633

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 5:57DETMoritz SeiderPPAssists: Lucas Raymond, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 7:35ANACutter GauthierAssists: Beckett Sennecke, Jacob Trouba · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:42DETMichael RasmussenAssists: Andrew Copp, Jonatan Berggren · Snap, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:54ANAChris KreiderAssists: Jackson LaCombe, Drew Helleson · Snap, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 15:33DETAxel Sandin-PellikkaAssists: Michael Rasmussen, Jonatan Berggren · Snap, 0.00 xG2–3
  6. P3 0:50DETAlex DeBrincatPPGWGAssists: Moritz Seider, Patrick Kane · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:33ANAMikael GranlundAssists: Ian Moore, Ryan Strome · Tip-in, 0.05 xG3–4
  8. P3 5:06DETDylan LarkinAssists: Lucas Raymond, Alex DeBrincat · Backhand, 0.17 xG3–5
  9. P3 17:59DETAlex DeBrincatENAssists: Dylan Larkin · Wrist, 0.55 xG3–6
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 7:13ANAMason McTavish: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 7:13DETMarco Kasper: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 10:40ANADrew Helleson: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 17:03DETJonatan Berggren: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 18:25ANABeckett Sennecke: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P1 18:25DETSimon Edvinsson: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P1 18:29ANAMason McTavish: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 1:16DETAlex DeBrincat: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 5:23ANAMason McTavish: Holding2 min · PPG
  10. P2 18:13ANAAlex Killorn: Holding the stick2 min
  11. P2 18:13DETAlbert Johansson: Holding2 min
  12. P3 0:45ANAChris Kreider: Roughing2 min · PPG
  13. P3 8:21DETSimon Edvinsson: Holding2 min
  14. P3 19:44ANARoss Johnston: Misconduct10 min
  15. P3 19:44DETSimon Edvinsson: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00McTavish won the faceoff against Compher
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANADET
28Shots on goal33
3.0Expected goals3.5
65Shot attempts58
32Faceoffs won31
3Power plays4
24Penalty minutes22
21Hits16
14Blocked shots17
12Giveaways20
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Granlund – Strome3:20

    xG 0.31–0.04 (89%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  2. Strome – Johnston – Vatrano5:20

    xG 0.15–0.09 (62%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Johnston – Vatrano – Nesterenko2:35

    xG 0.04–0.01 (77%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Killorn – Granlund – Nesterenko5:06

    xG 0.22–0.36 (38%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMoore – Mintyukov10:41

    xG 0.67–0.41 (62%)attempts 12–12goals 1–1

  2. Helleson – LaCombe10:22

    xG 0.23–0.27 (46%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  3. Trouba – Zellweger11:42

    xG 0.68–0.78 (47%)attempts 11–12goals 1–1

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestLarkin – DeBrincat – Raymond11:06

    xG 0.93–0.37 (72%)attempts 14–9goals 1–1

  2. Appleton – Kasper – Danielson9:08

    xG 0.25–0.29 (46%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

  3. Copp – Rasmussen – Berggren8:30

    xG 0.38–0.52 (42%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  4. Kane – Compher – Finnie7:41

    xG 0.22–0.63 (26%)attempts 3–10goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeider – Edvinsson15:30

    xG 0.68–0.49 (58%)attempts 15–14goals 1–2

  2. Chiarot – Sandin-Pellikka9:52

    xG 0.49–0.52 (49%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0

  3. Bernard-Docker – Johansson3:21

    xG 0.16–0.24 (41%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 3.5 xGANA 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #228 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.99 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 58% of the time.

DET winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).