Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 14, 2025·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Philadelphia Flyers 6, St. Louis Blues 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 56% of the time.

STL winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHI1821126061631
STL281424010517

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:19STLJordan KyrouUnassisted · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:18PHITrevor ZegrasAssists: Christian Dvorak, Travis Sanheim · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 9:42STLJimmy SnuggerudAssists: Robert Thomas · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:54STLJustin FaulkAssists: Cam Fowler, Oskar Sundqvist · Slap, 0.02 xG1–3
  5. P2 7:17PHIChristian DvorakAssists: Owen Tippett, Emil Andrae · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P2 18:24PHITrevor ZegrasAssists: Emil Andrae, Owen Tippett · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. P3 0:40STLDylan HollowayAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Cam Fowler · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–4
  8. P3 4:56STLRobert ThomasAssists: Jimmy Snuggerud · Snap, 0.14 xG3–5
  9. P3 7:53PHIChristian DvorakAssists: Owen Tippett · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–5
  10. P3 10:29PHIOwen TippettAssists: Trevor Zegras, Noah Juulsen · Snap, 0.13 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. STL Robert Thomas stopped
  2. 2. PHI Trevor Zegras scored
  3. 3. STL Jimmy Snuggerud stopped
  4. 4. PHI Matvei Michkov stopped
  5. 5. STL Dylan Holloway stopped
Penalties (3)
  1. P2 0:48PHIChristian Dvorak: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 14:48STLColton Parayko: Tripping2 min
  3. OT 2:51STLPavel Buchnevich: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win53% to win
← PHI attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thomas won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHISTL
31Shots on goal17
2.5Expected goals2.2
52Shot attempts47
23Faceoffs won30
1Power plays1
2Penalty minutes2
18Hits20
16Blocked shots11
10Giveaways13
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestDvorak – Tippett – Zegras12:14

    xG 0.83–0.44 (65%)attempts 18–7goals 5–1

  2. Cates – Brink – Foerster12:53

    xG 0.28–0.28 (50%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Couturier – Konecny – Michkov10:43

    xG 0.31–0.39 (45%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

  4. Deslauriers – Hathaway – Abols7:11

    xG 0.02–0.11 (16%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJuulsen – Andrae12:38

    xG 0.88–0.33 (73%)attempts 12–7goals 3–0

  2. Seeler – Drysdale15:12

    xG 0.13–0.28 (32%)attempts 13–10goals 0–1

  3. Sanheim – York17:39

    xG 0.43–0.77 (36%)attempts 15–16goals 0–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSchenn – Kyrou – Holloway9:39

    xG 0.45–0.13 (77%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  2. Schenn – Joseph – Suter6:07

    xG 0.19–0.01 (97%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Buchnevich – Thomas – Snuggerud13:08

    xG 0.54–0.50 (52%)attempts 10–12goals 2–1

  4. Joseph – Suter – Dvorsky3:24

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestParayko – Broberg22:07

    xG 0.73–0.34 (68%)attempts 15–15goals 0–1

  2. Faulk – Kessel3:09

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Skinner – Kessel8:35

    xG 0.21–0.28 (43%)attempts 4–6goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.2 xGPHI 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #27 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.69 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 56% of the time.

STL winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).