Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 3, 2025·Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia

Buffalo Sabres 2, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 68% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF14114011229
PHI311212012535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:08BUFJason ZuckerPPAssists: Josh Doan, Josh Norris · Snap, 0.25 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:26PHITravis KonecnyPPAssists: Matvei Michkov, Travis Sanheim · Snap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 9:04PHITrevor ZegrasPPAssists: Travis Sanheim, Travis Konecny · Snap, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P1 9:25PHIBobby BrinkGWGAssists: Noah Cates, Nikita Grebenkin · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P2 1:45PHINoah CatesAssists: Bobby Brink, Jamie Drysdale · Snap, 0.32 xG1–4
  6. P2 11:48BUFBowen ByramAssists: Alex Tuch, Jack Quinn · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–4
  7. P2 12:43PHIOwen TippettAssists: Matvei Michkov, Sean Couturier · Bat, 0.15 xG2–5
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 3:20PHICam York: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  2. P1 4:38PHIMatvei Michkov: Interference2 min
  3. P1 5:30BUFTage Thompson: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 6:46BUFConor Timmins: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  5. P1 8:26BUFJason Zucker: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min · PPG
  6. P1 17:19PHIRodrigo Abols: Tripping2 min
  7. P1 19:40BUFPeyton Krebs: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 9:24PHINicolas Deslauriers: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 9:24PHIGarnet Hathaway: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 9:24BUFJosh Dunne: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 16:50BUFRasmus Dahlin: Boarding5 min
  12. P2 16:50BUFRasmus Dahlin: Game misconduct10 min
  13. P3 2:46PHITravis Sanheim: Holding2 min
  14. P3 6:21PHIMatvei Michkov: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Norris won the faceoff against Dvorak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPHI
29Shots on goal35
3.8Expected goals5.2
65Shot attempts68
27Faceoffs won30
6Power plays5
25Penalty minutes14
16Hits18
20Blocked shots15
13Giveaways9
3Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestTuch – Doan – Ostlund6:02

    xG 0.41–0.15 (74%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Thompson – Norris – Benson7:42

    xG 0.82–0.71 (53%)attempts 18–10goals 0–1

  3. Malenstyn – Krebs – Dunne6:06

    xG 0.07–0.33 (18%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  4. Zucker – McLeod – Quinn7:42

    xG 0.41–1.08 (27%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestByram – Power4:29

    xG 0.83–0.47 (64%)attempts 12–3goals 1–0

  2. Bryson – Power5:58

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Bryson – Samuelsson2:14

    xG 0.09–0.08 (54%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCouturier – Tippett – Michkov8:23

    xG 1.01–0.47 (68%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  2. Deslauriers – Hathaway – Abols8:12

    xG 0.15–0.08 (65%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Dvorak – Konecny – Zegras6:27

    xG 0.26–0.51 (33%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  4. Cates – Brink – Grebenkin8:24

    xG 0.44–0.97 (31%)attempts 6–17goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAndrae – Drysdale11:45

    xG 1.67–0.38 (81%)attempts 18–9goals 3–0

  2. Sanheim – York5:54

    xG 0.49–0.38 (57%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

  3. Seeler – Sanheim3:24

    xG 0.58–0.59 (50%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 5.2 xGBUF 3.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #679 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.06 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 68% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).