Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 5, 2025·Honda Center, Anaheim

Washington Capitals 3, Anaheim Ducks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 70% of the time.

ANA winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
WSH182903011321
ANA11221508032438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:29WSHTom WilsonAssists: Justin Sourdif, Trevor van Riemsdyk · Snap, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:16ANACutter GauthierAssists: Beckett Sennecke, Jackson LaCombe · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:06WSHEthen FrankUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:19ANARoss JohnstonAssists: Radko Gudas, Olen Zellweger · Tip-in, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P2 7:38WSHAliaksei ProtasAssists: Matt Roy, Dylan Strome · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P2 17:59ANABeckett SenneckeAssists: Ross Johnston · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Leo Carlsson stopped
  2. 2. WSH Dylan Strome stopped
  3. 3. ANA Troy Terry scored
  4. 4. WSH Anthony Beauvillier scored
  5. 5. ANA Mason McTavish scored
  6. 6. WSH Ethen Frank stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 11:34ANABeckett Sennecke: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 16:04WSHJakob Chychrun: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 0:22WSHJakob Chychrun: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 9:40WSHAliaksei Protas: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 11:46WSHJakob Chychrun: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 5:07ANAFrank Vatrano: Interference2 min
  7. P3 8:52WSHDylan Strome: Interference2 min
  8. P3 9:45ANAJackson LaCombe: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win53% to win
← WSH attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Carlsson won the faceoff against Sourdif
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHANA
21Shots on goal38
2.7Expected goals4.0
60Shot attempts75
23Faceoffs won27
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes6
21Hits18
21Blocked shots19
21Giveaways16
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestDowd – McMichael – Leonard2:34

    xG 0.24–0.09 (74%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Wilson – Protas – Sourdif4:25

    xG 0.40–0.25 (62%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  3. Duhaime – Lapierre – Frank3:03

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Ovechkin – Strome – Protas5:28

    xG 0.25–0.28 (48%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestvan Riemsdyk – Chisholm8:10

    xG 0.51–0.14 (78%)attempts 15–7goals 1–0

  2. Chychrun – Fehérváry2:15

    xG 0.24–0.13 (65%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Roy – Chychrun12:45

    xG 0.49–0.52 (49%)attempts 14–13goals 1–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestMcTavish – Gauthier – Sennecke9:02

    xG 0.48–0.19 (72%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  2. Killorn – Strome – Vatrano2:51

    xG 0.31–0.03 (90%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Kreider – Terry – Carlsson13:18

    xG 0.50–0.46 (53%)attempts 15–15goals 0–0

  4. Granlund – McTavish – Gauthier2:39

    xG 0.15–0.45 (25%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – Zellweger10:30

    xG 0.66–0.24 (74%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  2. Trouba – LaCombe15:39

    xG 0.83–0.61 (58%)attempts 19–19goals 0–1

  3. Helleson – Mintyukov12:12

    xG 0.20–0.68 (23%)attempts 11–16goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 4.0 xGWSH 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #308 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.17 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 70% of the time.

ANA winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).