Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 11, 2025·Ball Arena, Denver

Florida Panthers 2, Colorado Avalanche 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 74% of the time.

COL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA1120815225
COL22031418642

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:14COLSam MalinskiAssists: Martin Necas, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:21FLANoah GregorAssists: Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:30COLBrock NelsonAssists: Cale Makar, Valeri Nichushkin · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:05COLGavin BrindleyGWGAssists: Brent Burns, Josh Manson · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P2 7:18COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Samuel Girard, Sam Malinski · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–4
  6. P2 12:31COLArtturi LehkonenAssists: Gavin Brindley, Devon Toews · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–5
  7. P3 6:18COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Martin Necas, Josh Manson · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–6
  8. P3 13:08FLAMackie SamoskevichAssists: A.J. Greer, Evan Rodrigues · Snap, 0.30 xG2–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 9:33FLACarter Verhaeghe: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 13:19COLJosh Manson: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 15:52FLANiko Mikkola: Holding2 min
  4. P2 18:52FLAMackie Samoskevich: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 7:47COLGavin Brindley: Holding2 min
  6. P3 14:58FLAAaron Ekblad: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← FLA attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nelson won the faceoff against Bennett
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLACOL
25Shots on goal42
2.2Expected goals3.7
53Shot attempts72
17Faceoffs won39
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
28Hits11
13Blocked shots17
11Giveaways21
7Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. Reinhart – Luostarinen – Lundell10:42

    xG 0.63–0.66 (49%)attempts 16–14goals 0–3

  2. Greer – Rodrigues – Samoskevich7:42

    xG 0.32–0.64 (34%)attempts 6–12goals 1–1

  3. Gregor – Boqvist – Studnicka9:42

    xG 0.12–0.61 (16%)attempts 10–12goals 0–2

  4. Marchand – Verhaeghe – Bennett11:59

    xG 0.20–0.95 (18%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Balinskis12:04

    xG 0.53–0.36 (60%)attempts 18–10goals 1–1

  2. Ekblad – Balinskis2:40

    xG 0.01–0.27 (3%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

  3. Petry – Forsling3:46

    xG 0.00–0.32 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestNelson – Landeskog – Nichushkin8:19

    xG 0.68–0.31 (69%)attempts 11–5goals 1–1

  2. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Brindley5:52

    xG 0.65–0.35 (65%)attempts 9–4goals 2–1

  3. Olofsson – Colton – Brindley3:33

    xG 0.33–0.03 (92%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  4. Kelly – Drury – Kiviranta2:28

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Manson9:56

    xG 1.02–0.21 (83%)attempts 16–8goals 2–0

  2. Girard – Malinski9:32

    xG 0.55–0.16 (78%)attempts 15–6goals 2–0

  3. Burns – Malinski3:13

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.7 xGFLA 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 42/100 · #814 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.87 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 74% of the time.

COL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).