Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 16, 2025·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Edmonton Oilers 6, Pittsburgh Penguins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 61% of the time.

PIT winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM2102726623
PIT1919212430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:38EDMZach HymanPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl · Backhand, 0.30 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:52EDMConnor McDavidPPAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Evan Bouchard · Backhand, 0.19 xG2–0
  3. P1 19:15PITTommy NovakAssists: Anthony Mantha · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:35EDMMatt SavoieAssists: Alec Regula, Mattias Janmark · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–1
  5. P2 6:24PITErik KarlssonPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Rickard Rakell · Slap, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P2 9:36EDMEvan BouchardPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P3 6:47EDMVasily PodkolzinGWGAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.14 xG5–2
  8. P3 16:51PITBryan RustAssists: Anthony Mantha, Erik Karlsson · Backhand, 0.19 xG5–3
  9. P3 18:41EDMConnor McDavidENAssists: Zach Hyman · Wrist, 0.64 xG6–3
  10. P3 19:46PITDanton HeinenAssists: Tommy Novak, Ryan Shea · Wrist, 0.17 xG6–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 6:14EDMMattias Ekholm: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 9:12PITDanton Heinen: Interference2 min
  3. P1 10:20PITBryan Rust: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 10:38PITBrett Kulak: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. P2 5:30EDMLeon Draisaitl: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 8:06PITJustin Brazeau: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 14:02EDMDarnell Nurse: Interference2 min
  8. P2 18:14EDMAlec Regula: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 8:14EDMTy Emberson: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← EDM attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMPIT
23Shots on goal30
4.1Expected goals3.3
54Shot attempts64
31Faceoffs won19
4Power plays6
12Penalty minutes8
8Hits27
19Blocked shots8
14Giveaways16
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid10:06

    xG 0.75–0.31 (70%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

  2. Draisaitl – Podkolzin – Savoie8:52

    xG 0.58–0.40 (59%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  3. Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavid3:18

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Henrique – Janmark – Mangiapane8:32

    xG 0.17–0.11 (60%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard11:41

    xG 0.45–0.18 (72%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Emberson – Stastney10:29

    xG 0.44–0.57 (43%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  3. Nurse – Regula15:02

    xG 0.42–1.14 (27%)attempts 9–26goals 1–2

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHayes – Mantha – Novak5:47

    xG 0.68–0.09 (89%)attempts 11–5goals 1–1

  2. Heinen – Acciari – Dewar8:11

    xG 0.22–0.16 (58%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Crosby – Rust – Rakell9:08

    xG 0.67–0.70 (49%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1

  4. Brazeau – McGroarty – Kindel9:13

    xG 0.10–0.31 (24%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Wotherspoon10:04

    xG 0.94–0.46 (67%)attempts 13–9goals 0–2

  2. Wotherspoon – Shea2:23

    xG 0.24–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  3. Letang – Shea13:26

    xG 0.58–0.42 (58%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.3 xGEDM 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #317 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.32 · 10 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 61% of the time.

PIT winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).