Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 19, 2025·Ball Arena, Denver

Winnipeg Jets 2, Colorado Avalanche 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 87% of the time.

COL winsWPG wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WPG081717222
COL21101114326

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:45COLBrent BurnsAssists: Josh Manson, Joel Kiviranta · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:05COLMartin NecasAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Artturi Lehkonen · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P2 19:22WPGMorgan BarronSHAssists: Alex Iafallo · Backhand, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P3 1:58COLParker KellyGWGAssists: Josh Manson, Valeri Nichushkin · Snap, 0.24 xG1–3
  5. P3 3:38WPGMark ScheifelePPAssists: Gustav Nyquist · Snap, 0.23 xG2–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 10:55COLGabriel Landeskog: Holding2 min
  2. P2 2:45COLJosh Manson: Fighting5 min
  3. P2 2:45WPGTanner Pearson: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 3:33WPGMark Scheifele: Holding2 min
  5. P2 12:50WPGNino Niederreiter: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P2 19:04WPGCole Perfetti: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 3:31COLDevon Toews: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WPG00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← WPG attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lowry won the faceoff against Nelson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WPGCOL
22Shots on goal26
1.3Expected goals3.7
48Shot attempts58
28Faceoffs won27
2Power plays3
11Penalty minutes9
20Hits21
15Blocked shots13
14Giveaways12
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. Nyquist – Niederreiter – Namestnikov2:58

    xG 0.12–0.14 (46%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Toews – Nyquist – Pearson3:11

    xG 0.05–0.09 (36%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Niederreiter – Namestnikov – Perfetti3:42

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–2

  4. Lowry – Iafallo – Barron9:20

    xG 0.08–0.57 (13%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Samberg – Pionk16:34

    xG 0.09–0.43 (17%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

  2. Morrissey – Stanley2:08

    xG 0.00–0.49 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. DeMelo – Morrissey15:00

    xG 0.33–0.87 (28%)attempts 14–12goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLehkonen – MacKinnon – Necas12:39

    xG 0.71–0.16 (81%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Nelson – Landeskog – Nichushkin10:12

    xG 0.48–0.16 (75%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  3. Olofsson – Colton – Brindley6:37

    xG 0.32–0.21 (60%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Kelly – Drury – Kiviranta8:31

    xG 0.30–0.22 (58%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar15:34

    xG 0.73–0.23 (76%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  2. Girard – Malinski14:51

    xG 0.76–0.37 (67%)attempts 15–12goals 0–0

  3. Burns – Manson13:07

    xG 0.29–0.11 (72%)attempts 9–10goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.7 xGWPG 1.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLWPG

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.

Excitement 32/100 · #935 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.08 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
WPG 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 87% of the time.

COL winsWPG wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − WPG), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).