Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 29, 2025·Honda Center, Anaheim

San Jose Sharks 5, Anaheim Ducks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 89% of the time.

ANA winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS272313513
ANA114114214442

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:43SJSMario FerraroAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Adam Gaudette · Tip-in, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:02ANATroy TerryAssists: Nikita Nesterenko · Backhand, 0.22 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:12SJSMacklin CelebriniAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Tyler Toffoli · Snap, 0.19 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:30SJSIgor ChernyshovAssists: Macklin Celebrini, Sam Dickinson · Backhand, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P2 12:17SJSWilliam EklundAssists: Macklin Celebrini · Snap, 0.13 xG4–1
  6. P2 16:26ANACutter GauthierAssists: Troy Terry, Ryan Poehling · Tip-in, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P3 3:07ANAPavel MintyukovAssists: Cutter Gauthier, Ian Moore · Snap, 0.14 xG4–3
  8. P3 13:47SJSZack OstapchukGWGAssists: Vincent Iorio, Barclay Goodrow · Tip-in, 0.05 xG5–3
  9. P3 15:58ANATroy TerryAssists: Mason McTavish, Jackson LaCombe · Wrist, 0.11 xG5–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 15:33ANADrew Helleson: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 9:13SJSShakir Mukhamadullin: Tripping2 min
  3. P3 7:41SJSMario Ferraro: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 10:04ANATroy Terry: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 16:51SJSJohn Klingberg: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Celebrini won the faceoff against Carlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSANA
13Shots on goal42
1.8Expected goals4.6
36Shot attempts84
26Faceoffs won32
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
17Hits18
19Blocked shots11
18Giveaways17
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. Toffoli – Wennberg – Graf10:36

    xG 0.08–0.39 (18%)attempts 3–11goals 0–0

  2. Reaves – Goodrow – Ostapchuk6:24

    xG 0.26–0.62 (29%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

  3. Skinner – Gaudette – Dellandrea6:57

    xG 0.10–0.74 (12%)attempts 3–14goals 0–0

  4. Eklund – Celebrini – Chernyshov11:13

    xG 0.58–1.35 (30%)attempts 10–16goals 2–3

Defence pairs

  1. Ferraro – Dickinson2:42

    xG 0.08–0.08 (48%)attempts 1–2goals 1–0

  2. Orlov – Klingberg16:03

    xG 0.35–0.74 (32%)attempts 14–15goals 1–0

  3. Iorio – Dickinson10:33

    xG 0.19–0.78 (20%)attempts 5–13goals 2–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestTerry – Poehling – Nesterenko10:45

    xG 0.92–0.28 (77%)attempts 13–5goals 1–1

  2. Kreider – McTavish – Sennecke4:12

    xG 0.64–0.08 (88%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – Strome – Harkins7:36

    xG 0.57–0.16 (78%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  4. Granlund – Gauthier – Carlsson4:35

    xG 0.28–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMoore – Mintyukov11:16

    xG 1.30–0.23 (85%)attempts 17–9goals 1–0

  2. Helleson – LaCombe8:25

    xG 0.92–0.38 (71%)attempts 8–7goals 1–2

  3. LaCombe – Moore4:50

    xG 0.43–0.01 (98%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 4.6 xGSJS 1.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANASJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #234 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.74 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 89% of the time.

ANA winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).