Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 31, 2025·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Calgary Flames 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 58% of the time.

CGY winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI04111012127
CGY13313110526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:30CGYMikael BacklundAssists: Matt Coronato, Blake Coleman · Slap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:08CGYJonathan HuberdeauGWGAssists: MacKenzie Weegar, Yan Kuznetsov · Slap, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:49PHITravis KonecnyUnassisted · Other, 1.00 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:03CGYRasmus AnderssonPPAssists: Connor Zary, Nazem Kadri · Slap, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:52CGYYegor SharangovichPPAssists: Matt Coronato, MacKenzie Weegar · Snap, 0.14 xG1–4
  6. P3 9:37CGYConnor ZaryAssists: Ryan Lomberg · Snap, 0.17 xG1–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P2 4:12CGYYan Kuznetsov: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 10:21PHICam York: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 10:25PHIChristian Dvorak: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 13:56CGYAdam Klapka: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 13:56PHINick Seeler: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 16:13PHIJamie Drysdale: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  7. P3 17:24CGYMacKenzie Weegar: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win53% to win
← PHI attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Beecher won the faceoff against Abols
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHICGY
27Shots on goal26
3.6Expected goals3.1
61Shot attempts66
25Faceoffs won30
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
23Hits15
18Blocked shots15
13Giveaways12
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestDvorak – Konecny – Zegras12:05

    xG 1.41–0.31 (82%)attempts 13–11goals 1–1

  2. Couturier – Tippett – Barkey9:03

    xG 0.56–0.09 (87%)attempts 13–7goals 0–1

  3. Cates – Brink – Michkov8:44

    xG 0.12–0.05 (70%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

  4. Abols – Grundstrom – Grebenkin9:31

    xG 0.22–0.74 (23%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeeler – Juulsen10:43

    xG 0.78–0.39 (67%)attempts 13–10goals 0–2

  2. Ristolainen – York14:31

    xG 0.58–0.21 (74%)attempts 17–8goals 0–0

  3. Ristolainen – Drysdale2:25

    xG 0.00–0.35 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Coleman – Coronato10:10

    xG 0.64–0.15 (81%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  2. Huberdeau – Frost – Klapka5:17

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 1–0

  3. Lomberg – Beecher – Zary3:39

    xG 0.24–0.20 (55%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  4. Lomberg – Beecher – Klapka5:43

    xG 0.08–0.10 (43%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHanley – Brzustewicz11:20

    xG 0.49–0.22 (69%)attempts 16–8goals 0–0

  2. Weegar – Kuznetsov18:11

    xG 0.56–0.47 (54%)attempts 21–12goals 2–0

  3. Andersson – Bahl15:50

    xG 0.40–0.81 (33%)attempts 9–20goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.1 xGPHI 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 26/100 · #1033 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.83 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 58% of the time.

CGY winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).