Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 1, 2026·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Detroit Red Wings 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 51% of the time.

PIT winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
DET1101101700327
PIT260911412431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:08PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Anthony Mantha, Erik Karlsson · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:46PITSidney CrosbyUnassisted · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P1 17:46DETJames van RiemsdykPPAssists: Marco Kasper, Simon Edvinsson · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:01DETAndrew CoppAssists: Ben Chiarot, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 15:51PITBlake LizotteAssists: Erik Karlsson, Parker Wotherspoon · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 17:02DETAlex DeBrincatPPAssists: Lucas Raymond, Dylan Larkin · Backhand, 0.15 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:58PITKris LetangGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Bryan Rust · Slap, 0.17 xG3–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 0:20PITSidney Crosby: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 3:44DETNate Danielson: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 9:43PITBrett Kulak: Holding2 min
  4. P1 12:47PITParker Wotherspoon: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 16:19PITTommy Novak: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  6. P2 10:09PITBryan Rust: Abuse of officials2 min
  7. P2 11:42DETLucas Raymond: Holding the stick2 min
  8. P3 4:01DETLucas Raymond: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 7:08PITBlake Lizotte: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 16:14PITJack St. Ivany: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← DET attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Larkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETPIT
27Shots on goal31
2.4Expected goals2.4
68Shot attempts66
27Faceoffs won30
8Power plays3
6Penalty minutes16
21Hits15
17Blocked shots18
11Giveaways11
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Copp – DeBrincat7:53

    xG 0.35–0.23 (61%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Kasper – Danielson4:41

    xG 0.09–0.29 (24%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Larkin – Raymond – Finnie9:18

    xG 0.03–0.30 (10%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  4. Compher – Appleton – Rasmussen12:40

    xG 0.32–0.59 (35%)attempts 11–22goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBernard-Docker – Johansson7:28

    xG 0.24–0.13 (66%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  2. Chiarot – Sandin-Pellikka8:34

    xG 0.27–0.43 (39%)attempts 5–12goals 1–1

  3. Chiarot – Johansson4:35

    xG 0.11–0.31 (26%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMantha – Novak – Brazeau6:58

    xG 0.61–0.07 (89%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Rust – Rakell11:42

    xG 0.55–0.06 (90%)attempts 17–6goals 1–0

  3. Acciari – Dewar – Lizotte6:54

    xG 0.32–0.25 (57%)attempts 13–6goals 1–0

  4. Chinakhov – McGroarty – Kindel7:06

    xG 0.02–0.34 (5%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Kulak15:02

    xG 0.67–0.06 (92%)attempts 23–8goals 0–0

  2. Karlsson – Wotherspoon10:48

    xG 0.74–0.49 (60%)attempts 18–13goals 1–1

  3. Shea – St. Ivany8:52

    xG 0.19–0.35 (35%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.4 xGDET 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITDET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #94 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.51 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 51% of the time.

PIT winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).