Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 3, 2026·Lenovo Center, Raleigh

Colorado Avalanche 5, Carolina Hurricanes 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 69% of the time.

CAR winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL01519411535
CAR11028010328

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:09CARSebastian AhoSHAssists: Eric Robinson · Backhand, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:47COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Martin Necas · Wrap-around, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:47CARNikolaj EhlersPPAssists: Taylor Hall, Logan Stankoven · Snap, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:50CARAndrei SvechnikovAssists: Sebastian Aho, K'Andre Miller · Backhand, 0.15 xG1–3
  5. P3 1:09COLBrock NelsonPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Cale Makar · Tip-in, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P3 1:42COLJack DruryAssists: Ross Colton · Snap, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. P3 7:30COLBrock NelsonPPGWGAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Cale Makar · Snap, 0.09 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:42COLNathan MacKinnonENAssists: Martin Necas, Artturi Lehkonen · Other, 0.81 xG5–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:36COLDevon Toews: Interference2 min
  2. P1 11:58COLJosh Manson: Interference2 min
  3. P1 16:33CARWilliam Carrier: Interference2 min
  4. P2 2:55COLZakhar Bardakov: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  5. P2 9:52CARK'Andre Miller: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 15:47CARJackson Blake: Holding the stick2 min
  7. P3 0:11CARAndrei Svechnikov: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P3 6:11CARNikolaj Ehlers: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
47% to win53% to win
← COL attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Aho
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLCAR
35Shots on goal28
5.4Expected goals4.1
66Shot attempts56
39Faceoffs won23
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes10
19Hits18
10Blocked shots15
13Giveaways16
5Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestOlofsson – Colton – Drury7:19

    xG 0.54–0.02 (97%)attempts 13–3goals 1–0

  2. Nelson – Lehkonen – Nichushkin9:48

    xG 0.72–0.22 (76%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  3. Kelly – Bardakov – Makar4:43

    xG 0.16–0.03 (85%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Necas11:48

    xG 0.88–1.51 (37%)attempts 11–16goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Manson10:56

    xG 1.03–0.26 (80%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

  2. Girard – Malinski11:37

    xG 0.48–0.32 (60%)attempts 13–6goals 1–0

  3. Toews – Makar10:03

    xG 0.35–1.60 (18%)attempts 7–18goals 0–1

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestEhlers – Aho – Svechnikov9:44

    xG 1.37–1.00 (58%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0

  2. Staal – Martinook – Stankoven8:25

    xG 0.36–0.43 (45%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1

  3. Carrier – Robinson – Kotkaniemi5:48

    xG 0.34–0.47 (42%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

  4. Hall – Jankowski – Blake8:22

    xG 0.03–0.30 (9%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWalker – Miller11:29

    xG 1.06–0.71 (60%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0

  2. Gostisbehere – Walker2:05

    xG 0.45–0.27 (63%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Gostisbehere – Chatfield12:12

    xG 0.72–0.61 (54%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 4.1 xGCOL 5.4 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #169 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.09 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 69% of the time.

CAR winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).