Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 3, 2026·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Boston Bruins 3, Vancouver Canucks 2 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 54% of the time.

VAN winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BOS16180612322
VAN0621601101234

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:24BOSFraser MintenPPAssists: Alex Steeves, Hampus Lindholm · Snap, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:48VANElias PetterssonAssists: Filip Hronek, Linus Karlsson · Deflected, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:25BOSElias LindholmPPAssists: David Pastrnak, Charlie McAvoy · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P2 18:44VANFilip HronekPPAssists: Zeev Buium, Evander Kane · Deflected, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. OT 4:41BOSFraser MintenGWGAssists: David Pastrnak, Mason Lohrei · Backhand, 0.13 xG3–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 14:46VANMarcus Pettersson: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:46VANMarcus Pettersson: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 17:31BOSViktor Arvidsson: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 3:15BOSNikita Zadorov: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 6:39VANMax Sasson: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 9:45BOSNikita Zadorov: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P2 14:54BOSMark Kastelic: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 18:36BOSHampus Lindholm: Holding2 min · PPG
  9. P3 0:21BOSPavel Zacha: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
47% to win53% to win
← BOS attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Minten won the faceoff against Pettersson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSVAN
22Shots on goal34
3.0Expected goals3.3
53Shot attempts70
39Faceoffs won19
3Power plays6
12Penalty minutes6
16Hits32
17Blocked shots12
15Giveaways13
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestLindholm – Geekie – Steeves7:54

    xG 0.56–0.15 (79%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  2. Kuraly – Eyssimont – Kastelic4:37

    xG 0.16–0.10 (62%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Pastrnak – Geekie – Minten2:08

    xG 0.05–0.07 (41%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Arvidsson – Zacha – Mittelstadt10:26

    xG 0.21–0.38 (36%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindholm – Aspirot13:21

    xG 0.51–0.23 (69%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  2. Zadorov – Peeke2:27

    xG 0.13–0.06 (71%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. McAvoy – Lohrei2:09

    xG 0.04–0.10 (31%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestDeBrusk – Pettersson – Karlsson6:57

    xG 1.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 16–0goals 1–0

  2. Kampf – Sherwood – O'Connor9:07

    xG 0.08–0.25 (25%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Hoglander – Räty – Ohgren6:44

    xG 0.05–0.23 (19%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Kane – Boeser – Sasson6:26

    xG 0.05–0.70 (6%)attempts 2–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHronek – Buium11:38

    xG 1.06–0.42 (72%)attempts 19–7goals 1–0

  2. Pettersson – Willander11:34

    xG 0.32–0.29 (53%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  3. Pettersson – Hronek2:31

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.3 xGBOS 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #706 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.62 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 54% of the time.

VAN winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).