Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 6, 2026·Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia

Anaheim Ducks 2, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 85% of the time.

PHI winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA150518218
PHI21321818539

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:15ANACutter GauthierPPAssists: Jackson LaCombe, Troy Terry · Slap, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:22PHITrevor ZegrasAssists: Christian Dvorak, Travis Konecny · Snap, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P1 14:23PHITrevor ZegrasPPAssists: Cam York, Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:15PHICam YorkGWGAssists: Nikita Grebenkin, Noah Cates · Snap, 0.05 xG1–3
  5. P2 14:40PHITravis SanheimAssists: Noah Cates · Slap, 0.05 xG1–4
  6. P3 1:25ANAAlex KillornPPAssists: Troy Terry, Jackson LaCombe · Snap, 0.12 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:46PHINikita GrebenkinENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.64 xG2–5
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 2:38PHINoah Cates: Instigator2 min · PPG
  2. P1 2:38ANAJansen Harkins: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 2:38PHINoah Cates: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 2:38PHINoah Cates: Instigator misconduct10 min
  5. P1 4:21PHITrevor Zegras: High sticking2 min
  6. P1 8:09ANATroy Terry: High sticking2 min
  7. P1 12:49ANAJansen Harkins: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  8. P1 18:08ANABeckett Sennecke: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 2:39ANARoss Johnston: Interference5 min
  10. P2 2:39ANARoss Johnston: Game misconduct10 min
  11. P2 9:23ANALeo Carlsson: Interference2 min
  12. P3 0:09PHISean Couturier: Tripping2 min · PPG
  13. P3 7:51PHIGarnet Hathaway: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 7:51ANARadko Gudas: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 8:14ANAJacob Trouba: Elbowing2 min
  16. P3 9:29ANAChris Kreider: High sticking2 min
  17. P3 15:46ANARadko Gudas: Elbowing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Abols won the faceoff against Poehling
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAPHI
18Shots on goal39
1.9Expected goals4.4
58Shot attempts68
24Faceoffs won41
3Power plays8
39Penalty minutes26
19Hits22
15Blocked shots23
15Giveaways18
2Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestMcTavish – Gauthier – Sennecke9:52

    xG 0.48–0.23 (67%)attempts 15–8goals 0–1

  2. Kreider – Terry – Carlsson8:03

    xG 0.35–0.21 (63%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – Johnston – Poehling2:27

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Killorn – Harkins – Poehling2:19

    xG 0.00–0.14 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLaCombe – Moore3:27

    xG 0.35–0.05 (87%)attempts 7–2goals 0–1

  2. Helleson – LaCombe3:01

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Trouba – Zellweger5:38

    xG 0.22–0.23 (50%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. Couturier – Tippett – Barkey5:27

    xG 0.13–0.14 (48%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  2. Dvorak – Konecny – Zegras8:24

    xG 0.41–0.43 (49%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0

  3. Abols – Grundstrom – Grebenkin2:54

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  4. Hathaway – Abols – Grundstrom4:07

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 0–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAndrae – Drysdale5:26

    xG 0.25–0.18 (57%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Seeler – Andrae3:44

    xG 0.07–0.03 (72%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Seeler – Ristolainen7:09

    xG 0.17–0.19 (47%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 4.4 xGANA 1.9 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #676 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.11 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 85% of the time.

PHI winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).