Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 8, 2026·Centre Bell, Montreal

Florida Panthers 2, Montréal Canadiens 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 60% of the time.

MTL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA06110111227
MTL281438620

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:59MTLNoah DobsonAssists: Mike Matheson, Oliver Kapanen · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:35MTLOliver KapanenAssists: Juraj Slafkovský · Backhand, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P2 5:33FLASam BennettUnassisted · Snap, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:41MTLAlexandre TexierGWGAssists: Alexandre Carrier, Nick Suzuki · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P3 7:26MTLAlexandre TexierAssists: Mike Matheson · Snap, 0.30 xG1–4
  6. P3 11:23FLASam BennettAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Niko Mikkola · Snap, 0.11 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:59MTLJuraj SlafkovskýENAssists: Oliver Kapanen, Lane Hutson · Other, 0.80 xG2–5
  8. P3 19:10MTLAlexandre TexierAssists: Sammy Blais, Joseph Veleno · Bat, 0.11 xG2–6
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 6:24MTLJuraj Slafkovský: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 10:45FLAUvis Balinskis: Interference2 min
  3. P1 17:41MTLJuraj Slafkovský: Interference2 min
  4. P2 16:54FLAAnton Lundell: High sticking double minor4 min
  5. P3 1:06MTLPhillip Danault: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 4:26FLADonovan Sebrango: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 4:26MTLSammy Blais: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 9:12FLASam Bennett: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 18:45FLADonovan Sebrango: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 18:45MTLArber Xhekaj: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 18:45MTLOwen Beck: Charging2 min
  12. P3 18:45FLADonovan Sebrango: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 18:45FLADonovan Sebrango: Misconduct10 min
  14. P3 18:45MTLArber Xhekaj: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
47% to win53% to win
← FLA attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kapanen won the faceoff against Bennett
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAMTL
27Shots on goal20
3.8Expected goals3.2
63Shot attempts45
34Faceoffs won25
3Power plays4
24Penalty minutes22
18Hits18
11Blocked shots20
18Giveaways10
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestRodrigues – Boqvist – Samoskevich6:25

    xG 1.12–0.11 (91%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. Verhaeghe – Bennett – Greer9:06

    xG 0.70–0.17 (81%)attempts 11–3goals 1–1

  3. Reinhart – Luostarinen – Lundell11:33

    xG 0.67–0.33 (67%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

  4. Kunin – Gregor – Studnicka4:32

    xG 0.00–0.28 (0%)attempts 1–6goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Sebrango7:51

    xG 1.46–0.47 (76%)attempts 10–4goals 1–2

  2. Ekblad – Forsling11:06

    xG 0.61–0.04 (94%)attempts 12–2goals 0–0

  3. Mikkola – Balinskis12:30

    xG 0.52–0.44 (54%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestSuzuki – Texier – Caufield9:37

    xG 0.67–0.37 (64%)attempts 9–8goals 2–0

  2. Blais – Veleno – Beck4:30

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Kapanen – Slafkovský – Demidov8:48

    xG 0.20–0.73 (22%)attempts 4–13goals 2–0

  4. Gallagher – Danault – Bolduc8:31

    xG 0.08–1.10 (7%)attempts 3–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Matheson – Carrier2:31

    xG 0.08–0.27 (22%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  2. Carrier – Hutson12:58

    xG 0.45–0.74 (38%)attempts 8–14goals 1–1

  3. Struble – Xhekaj7:03

    xG 0.51–0.87 (37%)attempts 6–4goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 3.2 xGFLA 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #689 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.91 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 60% of the time.

MTL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).