Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 10, 2026·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Anaheim Ducks 3, Buffalo Sabres 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 74% of the time.

BUF winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA08014314336
BUF11211139532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:03BUFJack QuinnAssists: Ryan McLeod, Zach Benson · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P2 7:22BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Peyton Krebs, Josh Doan · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P3 7:09BUFBowen ByramAssists: Tage Thompson, Peyton Krebs · Snap, 0.14 xG0–3
  4. P3 15:16ANAOlen ZellwegerAssists: Jackson LaCombe, Mikael Granlund · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P3 16:00BUFJack QuinnGWGAssists: Zach Benson, Owen Power · Snap, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P3 18:02ANALeo CarlssonAssists: Ian Moore · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:12ANAMason McTavishAssists: Leo Carlsson, Beckett Sennecke · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:49BUFJosh NorrisENAssists: Alex Tuch · Backhand, 0.82 xG3–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 7:27ANARadko Gudas: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  2. P2 1:07ANAIan Moore: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 2:00ANAOlen Zellweger: Holding2 min
  4. P2 4:29BUFMattias Samuelsson: Boarding2 min
  5. P2 13:02BUFRasmus Dahlin: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 13:10BUFJosh Doan: Interference2 min
  7. P3 13:10ANARyan Strome: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 13:10BUFJosh Doan: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 13:10ANARyan Strome: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 13:10BUFJosh Norris: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P3 13:10ANAMason McTavish: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Carlsson won the faceoff against Norris
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANABUF
36Shots on goal32
2.5Expected goals4.0
76Shot attempts54
36Faceoffs won31
2Power plays2
13Penalty minutes13
29Hits10
7Blocked shots22
20Giveaways19
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGranlund – McTavish – Gauthier10:12

    xG 0.35–0.26 (57%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

  2. Kreider – Strome – Poehling9:40

    xG 0.23–0.42 (36%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  3. Johnston – Nesterenko – Washe8:05

    xG 0.06–0.33 (16%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  4. Killorn – Carlsson – Sennecke13:01

    xG 0.70–0.98 (42%)attempts 18–15goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – Zellweger15:12

    xG 1.13–0.50 (69%)attempts 29–12goals 0–1

  2. LaCombe – Moore13:30

    xG 0.39–0.68 (36%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

  3. Helleson – Mintyukov15:02

    xG 0.20–1.02 (16%)attempts 10–11goals 0–3

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestMcLeod – Quinn – Benson9:35

    xG 0.67–0.24 (74%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  2. Zucker – Tuch – Norris11:39

    xG 0.59–0.41 (59%)attempts 9–15goals 0–1

  3. Greenway – Malenstyn – Ostlund7:01

    xG 0.05–0.12 (28%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  4. Thompson – Krebs – Doan11:50

    xG 0.50–0.59 (46%)attempts 9–14goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBryson – Metsa8:23

    xG 0.50–0.16 (75%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  2. Byram – Power17:03

    xG 0.66–0.34 (66%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

  3. Samuelsson – Dahlin18:31

    xG 0.84–1.28 (39%)attempts 14–32goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 4.0 xGANA 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #380 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.66 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 74% of the time.

BUF winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).