Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 16, 2026·Ball Arena, Denver

Nashville Predators 7, Colorado Avalanche 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 65% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH21121138730
COL217016110343

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:30NSHRyan O'ReillyAssists: Filip Forsberg · Backhand, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P1 1:24COLBrock NelsonAssists: Brent Burns, Valeri Nichushkin · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 7:32NSHRyan O'ReillyAssists: Luke Evangelista, Filip Forsberg · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P1 11:16COLBrock NelsonAssists: Josh Manson, Sam Malinski · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:01NSHRyan O'ReillyAssists: Luke Evangelista, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P2 18:04NSHMichael BuntingGWGAssists: Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–2
  7. P3 1:09COLMartin NecasAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Artturi Lehkonen · Snap, 0.08 xG4–3
  8. P3 15:13NSHFilip ForsbergPPAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.07 xG5–3
  9. P3 17:04NSHSteven StamkosENAssists: Michael Bunting, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.40 xG6–3
  10. P3 17:41NSHMichael McCarronENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.81 xG7–3
Penalties (3)
  1. P2 13:22NSHErik Haula: Interference2 min
  2. P3 13:55COLZakhar Bardakov: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P3 17:31NSHCole Smith: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← NSH attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHCOL
30Shots on goal43
3.5Expected goals2.7
57Shot attempts66
36Faceoffs won20
1Power plays2
4Penalty minutes2
16Hits14
12Blocked shots17
16Giveaways20
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Reilly – Forsberg – Evangelista13:30

    xG 0.68–0.54 (56%)attempts 18–16goals 3–0

  2. Jost – Svechkov – Wood8:53

    xG 0.32–0.54 (38%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  3. McCarron – Smith – Schaefer8:32

    xG 0.13–0.37 (26%)attempts 3–10goals 0–2

  4. Stamkos – Haula – Bunting11:48

    xG 0.30–0.54 (36%)attempts 13–15goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Skjei19:45

    xG 1.04–0.65 (61%)attempts 26–20goals 3–1

  2. Barron – Blankenburg11:02

    xG 0.17–0.52 (24%)attempts 8–13goals 0–1

  3. Hague – Perbix16:43

    xG 0.34–0.87 (28%)attempts 13–22goals 1–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestNelson – Nichushkin – Colton11:04

    xG 0.76–0.19 (80%)attempts 18–11goals 2–1

  2. Olofsson – Kelly – Drury8:33

    xG 0.44–0.11 (80%)attempts 11–1goals 0–0

  3. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Necas13:42

    xG 0.61–0.39 (61%)attempts 17–14goals 1–1

  4. Bardakov – Ivan – Brindley7:11

    xG 0.13–0.17 (43%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirard – Malinski5:29

    xG 0.43–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Manson10:18

    xG 0.47–0.20 (70%)attempts 17–7goals 1–0

  3. Burns – Makar4:08

    xG 0.15–0.08 (67%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.7 xGNSH 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #360 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.52 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 65% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).