Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 17, 2026·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 81% of the time.

PIT winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CBJ1421307022426
PIT2100819061333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:42CBJZachary Aston-ReeseAssists: Zach Werenski, Brendan Gaunce · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:59PITConnor CliftonAssists: Tommy Novak · Snap, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:52PITRickard RakellAssists: Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:32CBJKirill MarchenkoUnassisted · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P2 17:38CBJDanton HeinenAssists: Erik Gudbranson, Egor Zamula · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:59PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Kris Letang, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. CBJ Kent Johnson scored
  2. 2. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  3. 3. CBJ Adam Fantilli stopped
  4. 4. PIT Egor Chinakhov scored
  5. 5. CBJ Kirill Marchenko stopped
  6. 6. PIT Bryan Rust stopped
  7. 7. CBJ Charlie Coyle scored
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 6:14CBJZachary Aston-Reese: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 2:03CBJIvan Provorov: Interference2 min
  3. P2 8:43CBJZach Werenski: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 8:43PITParker Wotherspoon: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 14:15PITBlake Lizotte: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 19:21PITBrett Kulak: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 12:11CBJAdam Fantilli: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← CBJ attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Monahan
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJPIT
26Shots on goal33
2.6Expected goals4.9
55Shot attempts79
26Faceoffs won36
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
24Hits17
24Blocked shots14
13Giveaways14
10Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestCoyle – Heinen – Olivier3:03

    xG 0.36–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Gaunce – Heinen – Aston-Reese4:24

    xG 0.24–0.11 (68%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  3. Coyle – Olivier – Voronkov5:55

    xG 0.18–0.17 (52%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

  4. Marchenko – Sillinger – Fantilli9:36

    xG 0.33–0.85 (28%)attempts 8–17goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeverson – Werenski5:10

    xG 0.40–0.05 (89%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Severson – Provorov12:46

    xG 0.54–0.30 (64%)attempts 11–16goals 1–1

  3. Severson – Zamula2:27

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Novak – Chinakhov10:53

    xG 0.87–0.15 (85%)attempts 12–7goals 1–1

  2. Mantha – Brazeau – Kindel8:05

    xG 0.16–0.08 (67%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  3. Crosby – Rust – Rakell12:46

    xG 0.76–0.69 (53%)attempts 19–14goals 1–0

  4. Acciari – Dewar – Lizotte7:06

    xG 0.10–0.28 (26%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Shea13:44

    xG 0.94–0.31 (75%)attempts 18–6goals 1–1

  2. Wotherspoon – St. Ivany13:51

    xG 0.36–0.42 (46%)attempts 10–16goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Kulak15:12

    xG 0.84–0.96 (47%)attempts 19–16goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.9 xGCBJ 2.6 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #203 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.34 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 81% of the time.

PIT winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).