Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 19, 2026·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Pittsburgh Penguins 6, Seattle Kraken 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 63% of the time.

SEA winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT27115310632
SEA161819323

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:44PITParker WotherspoonAssists: Blake Lizotte, Anthony Mantha · Slap, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:50PITConnor DewarSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P1 16:12SEABen MeyersAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Ryan Winterton · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:55SEARyan LindgrenAssists: Ryan Winterton, Ben Meyers · Snap, 0.24 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:45PITBrett KulakAssists: Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P3 2:21PITJustin BrazeauGWGAssists: Anthony Mantha, Connor Clifton · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–2
  7. P3 7:47SEAEeli TolvanenPPAssists: Brandon Montour, Shane Wright · Slap, 0.06 xG4–3
  8. P3 16:48PITRickard RakellAssists: Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.10 xG5–3
  9. P3 19:30PITConnor DewarENAssists: Blake Lizotte · Wrist, 0.36 xG6–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 3:29SEARyan Lindgren: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 7:20PITBrett Kulak: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 7:57PITBlake Lizotte: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 17:02SEARyan Lindgren: Interference2 min
  5. P3 6:24PITBrett Kulak: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P3 10:21SEABrandon Montour: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Stephenson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITSEA
32Shots on goal23
3.4Expected goals2.6
65Shot attempts48
30Faceoffs won23
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
23Hits20
10Blocked shots16
18Giveaways17
6Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Novak – Chinakhov11:29

    xG 0.82–0.26 (76%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Acciari – Dewar – Lizotte7:26

    xG 0.24–0.15 (61%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Mantha – Brazeau – Kindel8:24

    xG 0.66–0.88 (43%)attempts 12–7goals 1–2

  4. Crosby – Rust – Rakell12:42

    xG 0.19–0.56 (25%)attempts 10–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Graves11:13

    xG 0.72–0.34 (68%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Kulak15:55

    xG 0.66–0.55 (55%)attempts 17–13goals 3–1

  3. Wotherspoon – Shea16:13

    xG 0.62–0.94 (40%)attempts 16–10goals 1–1

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestSchwartz – Winterton – Meyers5:58

    xG 0.72–0.01 (98%)attempts 9–3goals 2–0

  2. Kakko – Wright – Catton2:17

    xG 0.20–0.17 (54%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  3. Eberle – McCann – Beniers5:11

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Gaudreau – Winterton – Meyers2:38

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Montour – Lindgren13:08

    xG 0.64–0.77 (45%)attempts 13–14goals 1–0

  2. Larsson – Dunn16:12

    xG 0.29–0.45 (39%)attempts 6–17goals 0–1

  3. Oleksiak – Evans8:27

    xG 0.30–0.56 (35%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.6 xGPIT 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #238 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.72 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 63% of the time.

SEA winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).