Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 19, 2026·Scotiabank Arena, Toronto

Minnesota Wild 6, Toronto Maple Leafs 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 81% of the time.

TOR winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN29320110639
TOR1808214330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:45MINVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Ryan Hartman, Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:29MINRyan HartmanAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–0
  3. P1 18:24TORJohn TavaresPPAssists: Matthew Knies, Auston Matthews · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:53MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Brock Faber, Quinn Hughes · Tip-in, 0.02 xG3–1
  5. P2 8:24MINVladimir TarasenkoGWGAssists: Quinn Hughes · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–1
  6. P2 19:14MINMarcus FolignoPPAssists: Brock Faber, Danila Yurov · Tip-in, 0.13 xG5–1
  7. P3 6:27TORNick RobertsonAssists: Nicolas Roy, Easton Cowan · Deflected, 0.17 xG5–2
  8. P3 15:02TORAuston MatthewsAssists: Max Domi · Backhand, 0.15 xG5–3
  9. P3 17:22MINMarcus FolignoENAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Nico Sturm · Backhand, 0.79 xG6–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 3:58TORSimon Benoit: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 18:06MINJared Spurgeon: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  3. P2 4:36TORBrandon Carlo: Interference2 min
  4. P2 10:18MINQuinn Hughes: Interference2 min
  5. P2 17:23TOREaston Cowan: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 8:37MINVladimir Tarasenko: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Matthews won the faceoff against Hartman
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINTOR
39Shots on goal30
4.9Expected goals2.7
73Shot attempts54
25Faceoffs won29
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
21Hits23
13Blocked shots15
12Giveaways12
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov15:19

    xG 0.87–0.30 (74%)attempts 19–11goals 1–0

  2. Pitlick – Jones – Sturm5:11

    xG 0.35–0.40 (47%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

  3. Foligno – Hinostroza – Haight6:22

    xG 0.54–0.59 (47%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1

  4. Tarasenko – Trenin – Yurov9:08

    xG 0.27–0.47 (36%)attempts 6–17goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Middleton12:55

    xG 1.34–0.25 (84%)attempts 24–14goals 0–0

  2. Hughes – Faber16:28

    xG 0.94–0.94 (50%)attempts 20–19goals 3–0

  3. Spurgeon – Hughes3:40

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestRoy – Robertson – Cowan9:48

    xG 0.67–0.04 (94%)attempts 17–5goals 1–0

  2. Tavares – Maccelli – Knies11:28

    xG 0.52–0.35 (59%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  3. Jarnkrok – Laughton – Lorentz9:41

    xG 0.49–0.41 (54%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  4. Domi – Matthews – McMann10:38

    xG 0.43–0.60 (42%)attempts 9–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkman-Larsson – Rielly10:00

    xG 0.92–0.24 (79%)attempts 12–11goals 2–0

  2. Stecher – Benoit9:49

    xG 0.41–0.19 (68%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  3. Rielly – Carlo3:11

    xG 0.21–0.32 (39%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 2.7 xGMIN 4.9 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #373 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.01 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 81% of the time.

TOR winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).