Mon, Jan 19, 2026·United Center, Chicago
Winnipeg Jets 0, Chicago Blackhawks 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 65% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPG | 012 | 09 | 011 | 032 |
| CHI | 012 | 17 | 15 | 224 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 13:21CHIJason DickinsonGWGAssists: Ryan Donato, Alex Vlasic · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
- P3 18:40CHIConnor BedardENAssists: Ilya Mikheyev, Alex Vlasic · Wrist, 0.66 xG0–2
Penalties (5)
- P1 12:13WPGNino Niederreiter: Slashing2 min
- P1 12:50WPGLuke Schenn: Holding2 min
- P1 15:21CHILouis Crevier: Interference2 min
- P2 16:45WPGCole Perfetti: Tripping2 min
- P3 6:35CHIRyan Donato: Slashing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Greene won the faceoff against Toews
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Winnipeg Jets
Forward lines
- bestToews – Vilardi – Perfetti12:14
xG 1.07–0.08 (93%)attempts 17–6goals 0–0
- Pearson – Barron – Koepke4:55
xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0
- Scheifele – Connor – Iafallo13:26
xG 0.62–0.32 (66%)attempts 16–15goals 0–1
- Niederreiter – Lowry – Namestnikov9:18
xG 0.26–0.65 (28%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestSchenn – Samberg7:30
xG 0.76–0.12 (87%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1
- DeMelo – Stanley2:40
xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0
- Morrissey – Stanley4:46
xG 0.26–0.01 (98%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestSlaggert – Lardis – Moore6:10
xG 0.53–0.26 (67%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0
- Dickinson – Donato – Mikheyev12:50
xG 0.34–0.37 (48%)attempts 15–13goals 1–0
- Foligno – Lafferty – Dach8:10
xG 0.00–0.32 (0%)attempts 0–7goals 0–0
- Bertuzzi – Greene – Bedard9:48
xG 0.43–0.90 (32%)attempts 11–15goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Murphy – Vlasic2:16
xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0
- Grzelcyk – Crevier2:39
xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0
- Murphy – Grzelcyk10:30
xG 0.34–0.45 (43%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 65% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CHI − WPG), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).