Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 24, 2026·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Los Angeles Kings 5, St. Louis Blues 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 51% of the time.

STL winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
LAK1527113032528
STL0738111031429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:31LAKTaylor WardAssists: Jeff Malott, Samuel Helenius · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:11LAKBrian DumoulinAssists: Alex Laferriere, Adrian Kempe · Slap, 0.02 xG2–0
  3. P2 2:14STLDalibor DvorskyAssists: Otto Stenberg, Mathieu Joseph · Snap, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:30STLBrayden SchennPPAssists: Pavel Buchnevich, Jimmy Snuggerud · Snap, 0.25 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:10STLJordan KyrouAssists: Logan Mailloux, Cam Fowler · Wrap-around, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P2 10:18LAKAlex LaferriereAssists: Corey Perry, Mikey Anderson · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–3
  7. P3 11:34LAKTrevor MooreAssists: Brandt Clarke, Joel Armia · Wrist, 0.23 xG4–3
  8. P3 17:50STLJordan KyrouAssists: Justin Faulk · Snap, 0.06 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. LAK Adrian Kempe scored
  2. 2. STL Jake Neighbours stopped
  3. 3. LAK Brandt Clarke stopped
  4. 4. STL Jordan Kyrou stopped
  5. 5. LAK Kevin Fiala stopped
  6. 6. STL Dalibor Dvorsky scored
  7. 7. LAK Trevor Moore scored
  8. 8. STL Jimmy Snuggerud stopped
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 6:41LAKAdrian Kempe: Interference2 min
  2. P1 7:15STLJake Neighbours: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 17:30LAKBrandt Clarke: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 17:30STLJake Neighbours: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 17:30LAKBrandt Clarke: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 2:48STLNick Bjugstad: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 2:48LAKSamuel Helenius: Fighting5 min · PPG
  8. P2 5:13LAKKevin Fiala: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 13:16STLDalibor Dvorsky: Holding2 min
  10. P3 11:34STLJonatan Berggren: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win53% to win
← LAK attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Laferriere won the faceoff against Buchnevich
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKSTL
28Shots on goal29
3.2Expected goals3.1
64Shot attempts59
26Faceoffs won23
3Power plays3
13Penalty minutes13
17Hits20
14Blocked shots20
17Giveaways13
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestFiala – Turcotte – Kuzmenko9:49

    xG 0.48–0.30 (61%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

  2. Armia – Moore – Byfield12:46

    xG 0.54–0.40 (58%)attempts 12–11goals 1–1

  3. Perry – Kempe – Laferriere12:12

    xG 0.37–0.32 (54%)attempts 12–9goals 2–0

  4. Malott – Helenius – Ward5:07

    xG 0.12–0.21 (35%)attempts 5–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdmundson – Clarke10:41

    xG 0.72–0.39 (65%)attempts 15–16goals 2–0

  2. Doughty – Dumoulin2:54

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Ceci – Anderson3:22

    xG 0.17–0.12 (59%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBuchnevich – Kyrou – Neighbours9:57

    xG 0.57–0.10 (85%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  2. Schenn – Berggren – Snuggerud11:40

    xG 0.41–0.46 (48%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  3. Joseph – Dvorsky – Stenberg8:37

    xG 0.19–0.31 (38%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  4. Bjugstad – Walker – Toropchenko4:58

    xG 0.03–0.32 (9%)attempts 2–7goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestFaulk – Tucker12:38

    xG 0.44–0.27 (62%)attempts 14–11goals 0–1

  2. Parayko – Broberg17:26

    xG 0.72–0.92 (44%)attempts 15–21goals 0–1

  3. Fowler – Mailloux13:04

    xG 0.13–0.47 (22%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 3.1 xGLAK 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #53 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.69 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 51% of the time.

STL winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).