Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 31, 2026·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

San Jose Sharks 2, Calgary Flames 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 81% of the time.

CGY winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS1111608225
CGY115117110342

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:11SJSWill SmithPPAssists: Alexander Wennberg · Snap, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:44CGYMorgan FrostPPAssists: Matt Coronato, Jonathan Huberdeau · Snap, 0.38 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:21SJSAdam GaudetteAssists: William Eklund, Michael Misa · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:59CGYMatvei GridinAssists: Morgan Frost, MacKenzie Weegar · Snap, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:53CGYJoel FarabeeSHGWGAssists: Mikael Backlund, Kevin Bahl · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 2:38CGYBrayden Pachal: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:55SJSJohn Klingberg: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 14:18SJSZack Ostapchuk: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 18:53CGYMartin Pospisil: Boarding2 min
  5. P1 18:53CGYRyan Lomberg: Tripping2 min
  6. P1 18:53SJSVincent Desharnais: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 12:38SJSDmitry Orlov: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 19:00SJSMario Ferraro: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 4:46SJSZack Ostapchuk: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 4:46SJSBarclay Goodrow: Misconduct10 min
  11. P3 6:38CGYNazem Kadri: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 12:34CGYZach Whitecloud: Interference2 min
  13. P3 17:19SJSMichael Misa: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Celebrini
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCGY
25Shots on goal42
2.8Expected goals5.1
53Shot attempts82
26Faceoffs won34
4Power plays6
24Penalty minutes10
14Hits21
19Blocked shots18
18Giveaways9
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestToffoli – Wennberg – Kurashev8:22

    xG 0.60–0.51 (54%)attempts 11–15goals 0–0

  2. Gaudette – Eklund – Misa6:45

    xG 0.45–0.53 (46%)attempts 11–12goals 1–1

  3. Reaves – Goodrow – Ostapchuk5:46

    xG 0.02–0.36 (5%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

  4. Smith – Celebrini – Graf8:18

    xG 0.26–0.97 (21%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Desharnais – Dickinson8:08

    xG 0.22–0.20 (53%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

  2. Orlov – Dickinson3:47

    xG 0.22–0.38 (36%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  3. Orlov – Klingberg10:13

    xG 0.80–1.03 (44%)attempts 15–14goals 0–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestHuberdeau – Frost – Gridin8:37

    xG 0.87–0.08 (91%)attempts 18–6goals 1–0

  2. Kadri – Farabee – Klapka4:23

    xG 0.33–0.07 (83%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Backlund – Sharangovich – Coronato9:07

    xG 0.66–0.54 (55%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  4. Kadri – Farabee – Zary2:54

    xG 0.32–0.27 (55%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHanley – Pachal9:16

    xG 0.79–0.23 (77%)attempts 17–3goals 0–0

  2. Whitecloud – Bahl14:24

    xG 1.10–0.78 (59%)attempts 14–19goals 0–0

  3. Weegar – Kuznetsov12:38

    xG 0.70–0.53 (57%)attempts 21–13goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 5.1 xGSJS 2.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 49/100 · #715 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.58 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 81% of the time.

CGY winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).