Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 2, 2026·United Center, Chicago

San Jose Sharks 3, Chicago Blackhawks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 59% of the time.

CHI winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS01212114327
CHI144914617

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:00CHIConnor BedardPPAssists: Teuvo Teravainen, Tyler Bertuzzi · Snap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:14CHIConnor MurphyAssists: Matt Grzelcyk, Ryan Donato · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–2
  3. P2 9:35CHIRyan DonatoAssists: Ilya Mikheyev, Jason Dickinson · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–3
  4. P2 10:36CHISam RinzelGWGAssists: Ilya Mikheyev · Slap, 0.13 xG0–4
  5. P2 12:05SJSWill SmithAssists: Macklin Celebrini, Collin Graf · Snap, 0.08 xG1–4
  6. P2 12:41CHIIlya MikheyevAssists: Jason Dickinson, Ryan Donato · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–5
  7. P2 15:11SJSMacklin CelebriniAssists: Tyler Toffoli, William Eklund · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–5
  8. P3 2:13SJSShakir MukhamadullinAssists: Philipp Kurashev, Vincent Desharnais · Backhand, 0.14 xG3–5
  9. P3 14:41CHIRyan DonatoAssists: Ilya Mikheyev, Connor Murphy · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 1:42CHISam Rinzel: Interference2 min
  2. P1 5:34SJSWill Smith: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  3. P1 11:35SJSMichael Misa: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 15:56SJSAlexander Wennberg: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 3:51SJSPavol Regenda: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 18:19CHILouis Crevier: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P3 2:42CHIConnor Bedard: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 11:20CHIMatt Grzelcyk: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Celebrini won the faceoff against Nazar
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCHI
27Shots on goal17
2.7Expected goals2.2
52Shot attempts35
30Faceoffs won26
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
36Hits14
6Blocked shots9
19Giveaways14
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestToffoli – Smith – Celebrini12:56

    xG 0.90–0.56 (62%)attempts 23–7goals 1–2

  2. Gaudette – Kurashev – Misa3:45

    xG 0.40–0.09 (81%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  3. Kurashev – Regenda – Misa4:32

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  4. Reaves – Goodrow – Gaudette2:54

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFerraro – Dickinson8:36

    xG 0.77–0.24 (76%)attempts 10–6goals 2–2

  2. Desharnais – Mukhamadullin5:38

    xG 0.31–0.20 (61%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  3. Desharnais – Dickinson3:24

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestDickinson – Donato – Mikheyev8:37

    xG 0.59–0.39 (60%)attempts 9–9goals 4–0

  2. Slaggert – Dach – Moore5:44

    xG 0.11–0.02 (88%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Dickinson – Mikheyev – Slaggert2:07

    xG 0.25–0.22 (53%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Bertuzzi – Nazar – Bedard9:50

    xG 0.29–0.39 (43%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKaiser – Rinzel13:32

    xG 0.59–0.37 (61%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  2. Murphy – Grzelcyk5:15

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 2–0

  3. Murphy – Kaiser2:23

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.2 xGSJS 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHISJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #479 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.88 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 59% of the time.

CHI winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).