Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 4, 2026·Ball Arena, Denver

San Jose Sharks 2, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 86% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS0508212225
COL014217211442

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 1:05COLArtturi LehkonenAssists: Valeri Nichushkin, Cale Makar · Deflected, 0.21 xG0–1
  2. P2 15:47COLArtturi LehkonenAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Valeri Nichushkin · Snap, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P3 0:43SJSTimothy LiljegrenAssists: Alexander Wennberg, John Klingberg · Slap, 0.01 xG1–2
  4. P3 3:34SJSPhilipp KurashevUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P3 12:44COLJosh MansonGWGAssists: Valeri Nichushkin, Nathan MacKinnon · Slap, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:43COLBrock NelsonENUnassisted · Backhand, 0.69 xG2–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:57COLParker Kelly: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 10:09COLBrock Nelson: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 11:29SJSAlexander Wennberg: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 17:38SJSKiefer Sherwood: Holding2 min
  5. P2 4:08SJSPhilipp Kurashev: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 10:41COLZakhar Bardakov: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 11:50COLBrent Burns: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 11:50SJSMacklin Celebrini: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wennberg won the faceoff against Drury
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
25Shots on goal42
2.4Expected goals5.1
43Shot attempts78
22Faceoffs won34
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
24Hits16
21Blocked shots6
23Giveaways12
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestGoodrow – Gaudette – Ostapchuk7:05

    xG 0.73–0.38 (66%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  2. Wennberg – Kurashev – Graf9:30

    xG 0.14–0.34 (29%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  3. Sherwood – Smith – Celebrini10:44

    xG 0.31–0.85 (27%)attempts 8–18goals 0–0

  4. Toffoli – Eklund – Misa7:37

    xG 0.28–0.83 (25%)attempts 2–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDesharnais – Mukhamadullin8:38

    xG 0.60–0.22 (73%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  2. Liljegren – Mukhamadullin2:52

    xG 0.26–0.08 (76%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  3. Desharnais – Ferraro2:54

    xG 0.18–0.05 (79%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLehkonen – MacKinnon – Nichushkin9:46

    xG 1.00–0.24 (80%)attempts 15–9goals 2–0

  2. Nelson – Olofsson – Colton7:15

    xG 0.76–0.03 (96%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  3. Kelly – Drury – Kiviranta9:00

    xG 0.53–0.16 (77%)attempts 10–6goals 0–2

  4. Bardakov – Makar – Brindley2:06

    xG 0.32–0.58 (35%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirard – Malinski10:35

    xG 0.98–0.44 (69%)attempts 15–7goals 0–1

  2. Burns – Manson12:33

    xG 0.80–0.48 (62%)attempts 21–8goals 1–0

  3. Toews – Makar14:21

    xG 0.98–0.90 (52%)attempts 18–12goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 5.1 xGSJS 2.4 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #426 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.70 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 86% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).