Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 25, 2026·Honda Center, Anaheim

Edmonton Oilers 5, Anaheim Ducks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 67% of the time.

ANA winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM2102819527
ANA11019410629

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:13EDMJack RoslovicAssists: Matt Savoie, Darnell Nurse · Snap, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:03EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Connor McDavid, Matt Savoie · Snap, 0.24 xG2–0
  3. P1 10:30ANAIan MooreAssists: Jansen Harkins, Ross Johnston · Slap, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 3:01ANAAlex KillornPPAssists: Leo Carlsson, Mason McTavish · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–2
  5. P2 18:45EDMZach HymanAssists: Mattias Ekholm, Evan Bouchard · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:20EDMEvan BouchardAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Connor McDavid · Wrist, 0.11 xG4–2
  7. P3 1:30ANALeo CarlssonAssists: Jacob Trouba, Chris Kreider · Wrist, 0.16 xG4–3
  8. P3 2:55ANAOlen ZellwegerAssists: Radko Gudas, Troy Terry · Snap, 0.01 xG4–4
  9. P3 5:53EDMMatt SavoiePPAssists: Vasily Podkolzin, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.18 xG5–4
  10. P3 6:39ANABeckett SenneckeAssists: Jackson LaCombe · Snap, 0.09 xG5–5
  11. P3 18:46ANACutter GauthierGWGAssists: Leo Carlsson, Chris Kreider · Wrist, 0.11 xG5–6
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 1:14EDMMattias Ekholm: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 12:51EDMAdam Henrique: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 19:42ANACutter Gauthier: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 1:52EDMJack Roslovic: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 14:32EDMTy Emberson: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 3:56ANAIan Moore: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 19:37EDMConnor McDavid: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win53% to win
← EDM attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Draisaitl won the faceoff against Carlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMANA
27Shots on goal29
4.0Expected goals2.9
62Shot attempts54
33Faceoffs won24
2Power plays5
10Penalty minutes4
21Hits23
11Blocked shots15
15Giveaways24
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid12:07

    xG 1.17–0.75 (61%)attempts 15–11goals 1–1

  2. Draisaitl – Roslovic – Savoie9:08

    xG 0.69–0.39 (64%)attempts 13–11goals 1–2

  3. Lazar – Mangiapane – Frederic2:16

    xG 0.27–0.09 (74%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  4. Hyman – Draisaitl – Roslovic2:04

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard13:13

    xG 1.26–0.68 (65%)attempts 16–10goals 2–1

  2. Emberson – Stastney13:08

    xG 0.74–0.18 (81%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  3. Nurse – Walman15:06

    xG 0.93–0.57 (62%)attempts 16–17goals 1–4

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKreider – Terry – Poehling3:05

    xG 0.37–0.20 (66%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Killorn – McTavish – Sennecke7:55

    xG 0.24–0.10 (71%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Kreider – Gauthier – Carlsson4:09

    xG 0.38–0.30 (56%)attempts 6–5goals 2–0

  4. Killorn – Carlsson – Sennecke2:25

    xG 0.14–0.11 (56%)attempts 3–1goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTrouba – LaCombe12:38

    xG 1.04–0.51 (67%)attempts 18–9goals 3–0

  2. Gudas – LaCombe2:09

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. Moore – Zellweger5:02

    xG 0.15–0.35 (29%)attempts 3–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.9 xGEDM 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #23 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.71 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 10% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +50 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 67% of the time.

ANA winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).