Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 2, 2026·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Dallas Stars 6, Vancouver Canucks 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 95% of the time.

VAN winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL16216315637
VAN170403114

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:57VANEvander KaneAssists: Jake DeBrusk, Marcus Pettersson · Deflected, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:40DALAdam ErneAssists: Colin Blackwell · Snap, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:31DALLian BichselGWGAssists: Ilya Lyubushkin, Sam Steel · Snap, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:41DALJason RobertsonPPAssists: Matt Duchene, Miro Heiskanen · Slap, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P3 1:33DALMatt DucheneAssists: Sam Steel, Miro Heiskanen · Snap, 0.10 xG4–1
  6. P3 5:40DALColin BlackwellUnassisted · Snap, 0.15 xG5–1
  7. P3 15:41DALLian BichselAssists: Mavrik Bourque, Jason Robertson · Snap, 0.08 xG6–1
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 9:31DALJamie Benn: Roughing2 min
  2. P2 8:48VANFilip Hronek: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P3 12:06VANTom Willander: Holding2 min
  4. P3 12:45DALJamie Benn: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
47% to win53% to win
← DAL attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johnston won the faceoff against Pettersson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALVAN
37Shots on goal14
4.6Expected goals1.0
69Shot attempts30
30Faceoffs won30
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
19Hits19
8Blocked shots14
14Giveaways21
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestBenn – Duchene – Steel10:30

    xG 1.32–0.17 (88%)attempts 16–7goals 2–0

  2. Blackwell – Erne – Hryckowian8:31

    xG 0.64–0.18 (78%)attempts 11–3goals 2–0

  3. Bastian – Bäck – Hyry10:11

    xG 0.57–0.16 (78%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  4. Robertson – Bourque – Johnston14:38

    xG 0.63–0.24 (72%)attempts 13–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLundkvist – Harley18:49

    xG 1.58–0.27 (85%)attempts 26–5goals 2–1

  2. Lindell – Heiskanen16:12

    xG 1.36–0.17 (89%)attempts 18–10goals 1–0

  3. Lyubushkin – Bichsel15:39

    xG 0.82–0.32 (72%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. Kampf – Karlsson – Hoglander9:23

    xG 0.12–0.21 (36%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  2. Kane – DeBrusk – Pettersson9:05

    xG 0.24–0.49 (33%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

  3. Blueger – DeBrusk – Ohgren4:04

    xG 0.06–0.58 (9%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1

  4. Blueger – Garland – Ohgren7:40

    xG 0.00–0.60 (1%)attempts 2–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Joseph – Buium8:20

    xG 0.34–0.33 (51%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

  2. Pettersson – Pettersson3:03

    xG 0.00–0.51 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

  3. Hronek – Pettersson13:23

    xG 0.14–0.70 (17%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 1.0 xGDAL 4.6 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 28/100 · #1002 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.93 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 95% of the time.

VAN winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).