Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 5, 2026·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Florida Panthers 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 56% of the time.

CBJ winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA0807213228
CBJ1911029428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:08CBJIvan ProvorovPPAssists: Sean Monahan, Kirill Marchenko · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P2 10:50CBJMathieu OlivierAssists: Egor Zamula, Ivan Provorov · Deflected, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P3 1:41CBJBoone JennerGWGAssists: Kent Johnson · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–3
  4. P3 9:08FLANiko MikkolaAssists: Aaron Ekblad, Sam Reinhart · Tip-in, 0.04 xG1–3
  5. P3 14:44FLASam BennettPPAssists: Aaron Ekblad, Matthew Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:18CBJMathieu OlivierENAssists: Charlie Coyle, Ivan Provorov · Wrist, 0.81 xG2–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:44FLAMackie Samoskevich: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:53CBJDamon Severson: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P2 5:32FLAEvan Rodrigues: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 16:10CBJJake Christiansen: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 5:44FLADonovan Sebrango: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 5:44FLAUvis Balinskis: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 5:44CBJErik Gudbranson: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 14:02CBJKirill Marchenko: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win53% to win
← FLA attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Coyle won the faceoff against Bennett
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLACBJ
28Shots on goal28
3.9Expected goals3.5
76Shot attempts48
24Faceoffs won26
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
19Hits16
6Blocked shots20
15Giveaways13
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBennett – Tkachuk – Samoskevich9:45

    xG 0.69–0.57 (55%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  2. Nosek – Boqvist – Vilmanis7:45

    xG 0.32–0.36 (47%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Reinhart – Rodrigues – Lundell12:43

    xG 0.36–0.49 (42%)attempts 16–12goals 0–0

  4. Marchand – Verhaeghe – Luostarinen8:30

    xG 0.24–0.56 (30%)attempts 5–9goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkblad – Forsling13:03

    xG 0.73–0.34 (68%)attempts 18–9goals 0–0

  2. Kulikov – Mikkola15:54

    xG 0.84–0.67 (56%)attempts 21–10goals 0–0

  3. Sebrango – Balinskis12:23

    xG 0.55–0.85 (40%)attempts 10–13goals 0–1

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestJenner – Monahan – Johnson7:06

    xG 0.64–0.39 (62%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  2. Wood – Lundeström – Voronkov4:09

    xG 0.17–0.05 (78%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Marchment – Marchenko – Fantilli6:47

    xG 0.11–0.05 (67%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

  4. Wood – Voronkov – Fantilli2:20

    xG 0.10–0.11 (48%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudbranson – Christiansen9:42

    xG 0.66–0.31 (68%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0

  2. Gudbranson – Provorov5:25

    xG 0.24–0.24 (50%)attempts 3–12goals 0–1

  3. Gudbranson – Severson2:05

    xG 0.14–0.31 (31%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.5 xGFLA 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #550 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.84 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 56% of the time.

CBJ winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).