Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 6, 2026·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Carolina Hurricanes 6, Edmonton Oilers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 76% of the time.

EDM winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR2811836632
EDM131914316

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:43EDMZach HymanAssists: Connor McDavid, Mattias Ekholm · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:20CARShayne GostisbehereAssists: Seth Jarvis, Sebastian Aho · Slap, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:06CARNikolaj EhlersUnassisted · Snap, 0.01 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:37CARJordan MartinookAssists: Nikolaj Ehlers, K'Andre Miller · Backhand, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P2 3:20EDMVasily PodkolzinUnassisted · Snap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 7:32CARJackson BlakeGWGAssists: K'Andre Miller, Taylor Hall · Slap, 0.09 xG4–2
  7. P3 11:43EDMZach HymanPPAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Evan Bouchard · Snap, 0.14 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:39CARJordan StaalENAssists: K'Andre Miller, Frederik Andersen · Backhand, 0.82 xG5–3
  9. P3 19:31CARJackson BlakeAssists: Logan Stankoven, Sean Walker · Snap, 0.08 xG6–3
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 7:54EDMZach Hyman: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 17:46CARTaylor Hall: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 19:21EDMConnor McDavid: Interference2 min
  4. P3 8:50EDMMattias Ekholm: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 10:40CARK'Andre Miller: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
47% to win53% to win
← CAR attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dickinson won the faceoff against Aho
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CAREDM
32Shots on goal16
3.7Expected goals2.2
68Shot attempts37
24Faceoffs won31
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
15Hits27
9Blocked shots18
19Giveaways13
8Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Martinook – Ehlers9:14

    xG 0.46–0.27 (63%)attempts 12–7goals 2–0

  2. Jankowski – Carrier – Robinson8:27

    xG 0.16–0.23 (41%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  3. Hall – Stankoven – Blake10:17

    xG 0.30–0.41 (42%)attempts 13–6goals 1–1

  4. Aho – Svechnikov – Jarvis13:10

    xG 0.34–0.67 (34%)attempts 15–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWalker – Nikishin3:37

    xG 0.28–0.05 (85%)attempts 8–2goals 1–1

  2. Chatfield – Nikishin3:14

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Gostisbehere – Nikishin2:41

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 1–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid5:08

    xG 0.53–0.08 (86%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  2. Henrique – Frederic – Dach4:24

    xG 0.20–0.02 (93%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

  3. Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavid10:26

    xG 0.53–0.41 (56%)attempts 8–11goals 1–0

  4. Dickinson – Kapanen – Podkolzin9:20

    xG 0.19–0.17 (53%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard15:52

    xG 1.28–0.35 (79%)attempts 20–18goals 1–0

  2. Murphy – Nurse2:35

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  3. Walman – Emberson2:15

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.2 xGCAR 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMCAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #350 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.58 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 76% of the time.

EDM winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).