Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 8, 2026·Ball Arena, Denver

Minnesota Wild 2, Colorado Avalanche 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 77% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN0901529011234
COL01411218022336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 12:19COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Nazem Kadri · Snap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P3 4:17MINKirill KaprizovPPAssists: Quinn Hughes, Joel Eriksson Ek · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P3 7:01MINNico SturmSHAssists: Brock Faber · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–1
  4. P3 12:39COLNicolas RoyAssists: Brett Kulak, Joel Kiviranta · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Mats Zuccarello stopped
  2. 2. COL Valeri Nichushkin scored
  3. 3. MIN Matt Boldy scored
  4. 4. COL Martin Necas stopped
  5. 5. MIN Kirill Kaprizov stopped
  6. 6. COL Nazem Kadri stopped
  7. 7. MIN Vladimir Tarasenko stopped
  8. 8. COL Nathan MacKinnon scored
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 1:20MINQuinn Hughes: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 6:57MINZach Bogosian: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 0:43MINRyan Hartman: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 4:28COLNicolas Roy: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 4:13COLRoss Colton: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P3 5:17MINYakov Trenin: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 9:29MINKirill Kaprizov: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 14:58COLValeri Nichushkin: Slashing2 min
  9. OT 3:57COLNathan MacKinnon: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hartman won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
34Shots on goal36
2.9Expected goals4.9
65Shot attempts80
28Faceoffs won22
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
25Hits20
21Blocked shots14
19Giveaways9
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestEriksson Ek – Brink – Boldy6:19

    xG 0.17–0.02 (88%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. Foligno – McCarron – Sturm3:25

    xG 0.19–0.17 (53%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. Tarasenko – Trenin – Yurov7:52

    xG 0.25–0.30 (46%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  4. Eriksson Ek – Kaprizov – Boldy2:15

    xG 0.01–0.25 (3%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Brodin9:32

    xG 0.37–0.31 (54%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  2. Bogosian – Middleton9:07

    xG 0.46–0.53 (47%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Hughes – Faber16:08

    xG 0.84–1.01 (45%)attempts 19–17goals 0–2

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestKadri – MacKinnon – Necas11:10

    xG 0.88–0.52 (63%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  2. Drury – Kiviranta – Bardakov2:45

    xG 0.25–0.01 (96%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Roy – Kelly – Brindley4:36

    xG 0.28–0.06 (82%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Roy – Kelly – Drury2:10

    xG 0.22–0.02 (91%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar12:11

    xG 0.99–0.53 (65%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

  2. Manson – Kulak2:59

    xG 0.34–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  3. Kulak – Malinski10:02

    xG 0.49–0.29 (63%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 4.9 xGMIN 2.9 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #232 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.29 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 77% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).