Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 14, 2026·Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia

Columbus Blue Jackets 2, Philadelphia Flyers 1 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 60% of the time.

PHI winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CBJ1130807001228
PHI160507010119

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:21CBJKirill MarchenkoAssists: Adam Fantilli, Damon Severson · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:24PHIAlex BumpAssists: Emil Andrae, Christian Dvorak · Tip-in, 0.68 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Matvei Michkov stopped
  2. 2. CBJ Kent Johnson stopped
  3. 3. PHI Trevor Zegras stopped
  4. 4. CBJ Adam Fantilli stopped
  5. 5. PHI Travis Konecny stopped
  6. 6. CBJ Kirill Marchenko scored
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 14:13CBJKirill Marchenko: Boarding2 min
  2. P2 12:18CBJAdam Fantilli: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 12:18PHICarl Grundstrom: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 12:18CBJAdam Fantilli: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 12:18PHICarl Grundstrom: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 17:38CBJCole Sillinger: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 19:35CBJDamon Severson: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 19:35CBJDamon Severson: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 7:29PHIRasmus Ristolainen: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← CBJ attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Glendening won the faceoff against Coyle
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJPHI
28Shots on goal19
2.5Expected goals3.0
60Shot attempts52
32Faceoffs won29
1Power plays4
15Penalty minutes9
25Hits20
18Blocked shots19
17Giveaways16
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestMarchment – Marchenko – Fantilli6:20

    xG 0.80–0.18 (82%)attempts 16–5goals 1–0

  2. Monahan – Garland – Johnson8:30

    xG 0.63–0.06 (91%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  3. Jenner – Heinen – Lundeström6:49

    xG 0.16–0.08 (67%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Coyle – Olivier – Sillinger3:38

    xG 0.02–0.04 (32%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestProvorov – Mateychuk12:31

    xG 0.69–0.12 (85%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  2. Severson – Werenski7:07

    xG 0.37–0.14 (73%)attempts 11–3goals 0–0

  3. Severson – Provorov2:58

    xG 0.10–0.01 (91%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestDvorak – Konecny – Bump9:42

    xG 0.88–0.73 (54%)attempts 6–11goals 1–1

  2. Tippett – Zegras – Grebenkin6:47

    xG 0.14–0.38 (28%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  3. Cates – Barkey – Michkov7:32

    xG 0.06–0.30 (18%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  4. Couturier – Glendening – Grundstrom7:37

    xG 0.00–0.59 (0%)attempts 0–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeeler – Andrae7:54

    xG 0.71–0.18 (80%)attempts 5–8goals 1–0

  2. York – Drysdale14:28

    xG 0.31–0.43 (42%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  3. Andrae – Drysdale3:00

    xG 0.01–0.27 (4%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.0 xGCBJ 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHICBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #1088 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.12 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 60% of the time.

PHI winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).