Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 30, 2026·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

St. Louis Blues 4, San Jose Sharks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 67% of the time.

SJS winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL2419113426
SJS3111919529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:28STLTheo LindsteinAssists: Jake Neighbours · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:30SJSAlexander WennbergPPAssists: Macklin Celebrini, Tyler Toffoli · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:25SJSMacklin CelebriniPPAssists: Dmitry Orlov, Alexander Wennberg · Slap, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P1 16:39STLPavel BuchnevichAssists: Jake Neighbours · Tip-in, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P1 19:04SJSMacklin CelebriniAssists: Nick Leddy, Will Smith · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P2 10:13SJSAlexander WennbergPPAssists: Tyler Toffoli, Will Smith · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–4
  7. P2 19:34STLPhilip BrobergPPAssists: Dylan Holloway, Robert Thomas · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–4
  8. P3 12:53STLCam FowlerPPAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Pius Suter · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–4
  9. P3 19:38SJSAdam GaudetteGWGAssists: Mario Ferraro, Vincent Desharnais · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 7:11STLRobert Thomas: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:39STLDalibor Dvorsky: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:14SJSShakir Mukhamadullin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 1:52STLPius Suter: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 9:08STLPhilip Broberg: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 19:06SJSShakir Mukhamadullin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 11:08SJSYaroslav Askarov: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win53% to win
← STL attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ostapchuk won the faceoff against Finley
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLSJS
26Shots on goal29
2.2Expected goals3.2
52Shot attempts56
29Faceoffs won25
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
15Hits18
15Blocked shots15
11Giveaways12
1Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestKyrou – Thomas – Holloway4:59

    xG 0.46–0.19 (70%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

  2. Buchnevich – Kyrou – Neighbours6:41

    xG 0.49–0.33 (60%)attempts 8–7goals 1–1

  3. Berggren – Dvorsky – Stenberg8:55

    xG 0.10–0.01 (92%)attempts 11–3goals 0–0

  4. Toropchenko – Suter – Finley7:26

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBroberg – Mailloux16:12

    xG 0.92–0.44 (68%)attempts 14–14goals 0–2

  2. Fowler – Parayko3:56

    xG 0.23–0.13 (65%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Parayko – Lindstein13:30

    xG 0.16–0.28 (37%)attempts 15–7goals 1–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestSmith – Celebrini – Chernyshov14:04

    xG 0.71–0.24 (75%)attempts 18–9goals 1–0

  2. Goodrow – Gaudette – Ostapchuk8:01

    xG 0.32–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  3. Toffoli – Graf – Misa7:27

    xG 0.05–0.08 (41%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Wennberg – Sherwood – Eklund13:54

    xG 0.42–0.71 (37%)attempts 11–14goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeddy – Dickinson18:08

    xG 0.81–0.27 (75%)attempts 19–12goals 1–0

  2. Ferraro – Mukhamadullin14:30

    xG 0.21–0.17 (55%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

  3. Orlov – Desharnais12:31

    xG 0.22–1.07 (17%)attempts 9–17goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.2 xGSTL 2.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #80 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.35 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +52 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 67% of the time.

SJS winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).