Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Apr 1, 2026·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Anaheim Ducks 3, San Jose Sharks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 60% of the time.

SJS winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA1131919331
SJS170737421

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:37SJSWill SmithPPAssists: Macklin Celebrini · Slap, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:47ANARyan PoehlingAssists: Drew Helleson, Lukas Dostal · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 14:59ANAAlex KillornAssists: Drew Helleson, Jackson LaCombe · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P3 0:27SJSMacklin CelebriniAssists: Will Smith, Collin Graf · Snap, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:04ANATroy TerryUnassisted · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:21SJSMacklin CelebriniAssists: Dmitry Orlov, Will Smith · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–3
  7. P3 19:29SJSAlexander WennbergGWGAssists: Macklin Celebrini, Sam Dickinson · Snap, 0.09 xG3–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 2:17SJSTy Dellandrea: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 3:57ANAAlex Killorn: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 7:29SJSMichael Misa: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 9:43SJSDmitry Orlov: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 14:04ANATim Washe: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 16:13SJSVincent Desharnais: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 16:13ANAFrank Vatrano: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 4:47ANAJeffrey Viel: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 4:47SJSZack Ostapchuk: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Washe won the faceoff against Celebrini
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASJS
31Shots on goal21
3.1Expected goals2.5
53Shot attempts45
29Faceoffs won41
3Power plays2
11Penalty minutes13
20Hits25
15Blocked shots9
9Giveaways16
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKreider – Terry – Carlsson11:21

    xG 1.44–0.74 (66%)attempts 14–11goals 1–0

  2. Vatrano – McTavish – Gaucher5:07

    xG 0.23–0.12 (66%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – Granlund – Washe11:06

    xG 0.33–0.42 (44%)attempts 8–7goals 1–2

  4. Viel – Poehling – Sennecke9:03

    xG 0.13–0.44 (23%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHelleson – Zellweger10:02

    xG 0.43–0.27 (61%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  2. Carlson – Moore16:21

    xG 0.79–0.75 (51%)attempts 17–12goals 1–2

  3. Trouba – LaCombe16:51

    xG 0.84–0.91 (48%)attempts 14–16goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestToffoli – Dellandrea – Misa6:49

    xG 0.67–0.17 (79%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Smith – Celebrini – Graf13:55

    xG 0.46–0.14 (77%)attempts 6–15goals 1–0

  3. Goodrow – Gaudette – Ostapchuk5:04

    xG 0.12–0.10 (53%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Wennberg – Sherwood – Eklund9:59

    xG 0.34–1.14 (23%)attempts 10–9goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestFerraro – Mukhamadullin11:36

    xG 0.85–0.58 (60%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  2. Desharnais – Ferraro3:05

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  3. Leddy – Dickinson16:32

    xG 0.50–0.50 (50%)attempts 13–18goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.5 xGANA 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #219 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.26 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +51 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 60% of the time.

SJS winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).