Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Sep 30, 2026·Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia

Pittsburgh Penguins 7, Philadelphia Flyers 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 89% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT211315212738
PHI050707019

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:26PITNick RobertsonGWGAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:44PITVille KoivunenAssists: Samuel Girard, Kaedan Korczak · Backhand, 0.14 xG2–0
  3. P2 5:03PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Hendrix Lapierre, Tommy Novak · Slap, 0.15 xG3–0
  4. P2 7:26PITHendrix LapierreAssists: Filip Hallander, Declan Carlile · Snap, 0.10 xG4–0
  5. P2 10:23PITFilip HallanderAssists: Kaedan Korczak, Samuel Girard · Wrist, 0.24 xG5–0
  6. P3 11:52PITNick RobertsonSHAssists: Filip Hallander · Snap, 0.12 xG6–0
  7. P3 16:37PITEgor ChinakhovPPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Rickard Rakell · Tip-in, 0.10 xG7–0
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 10:42PHIJamie Drysdale: Holding2 min
  2. P2 3:23PHIPorter Martone: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 12:37PITNick Robertson: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 12:37PHISimon Benoit: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 12:37PITDeclan Carlile: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 19:42PHINick Seeler: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 4:26PITDeclan Carlile: Interference2 min
  8. P3 10:25PITConnor Dewar: Interference2 min
  9. P3 15:27PHITravis Konecny: Roughing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Dvorak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITPHI
38Shots on goal19
4.5Expected goals1.6
62Shot attempts47
22Faceoffs won36
4Power plays3
8Penalty minutes10
23Hits28
11Blocked shots8
11Giveaways21
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHallander – Lapierre – Koivunen6:28

    xG 1.22–0.02 (98%)attempts 11–2goals 3–0

  2. Crosby – Rakell – Robertson10:08

    xG 0.96–0.23 (81%)attempts 15–6goals 1–0

  3. Dewar – Lizotte – Soderblom7:10

    xG 0.26–0.08 (76%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Novak – Chinakhov9:32

    xG 0.17–0.21 (45%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirard – Korczak14:24

    xG 1.24–0.18 (88%)attempts 17–9goals 2–0

  2. Karlsson – Carlile11:04

    xG 1.08–0.24 (82%)attempts 15–7goals 1–0

  3. Letang – van Riemsdyk13:23

    xG 0.98–0.14 (87%)attempts 17–6goals 1–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCouturier – Acciari – Grundstrom6:08

    xG 0.22–0.13 (62%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  2. Acciari – Cates – Bump3:29

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Zegras – Bump – Martone2:08

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Tippett – Zegras – Martone4:22

    xG 0.03–0.17 (16%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. York – Drysdale11:18

    xG 0.28–0.43 (39%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

  2. Seeler – Benoit16:30

    xG 0.19–0.43 (31%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  3. Ristolainen – Sanheim13:54

    xG 0.22–1.71 (12%)attempts 13–25goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 1.6 xGPIT 4.5 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 5/100 · #50 of 52 this seasonSwing 0.59 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 89% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).