Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 1, 2026·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Seattle Kraken 6, Calgary Flames 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 72% of the time.

CGY winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SEA36012314632
CGY0608111125

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:10SEAJordan EberlePPAssists: Jared McCann, Vince Dunn · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:42SEAVince DunnGWGAssists: Ryan Winterton, Shane Wright · Slap, 0.01 xG2–0
  3. P1 19:30SEAFrederick GaudreauAssists: Kaapo Kakko, Ryker Evans · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–0
  4. P3 3:13SEAChandler StephensonAssists: Vince Dunn, Joey Daccord · Backhand, 0.16 xG4–0
  5. P3 4:04SEAMatty BeniersAssists: Jared McCann · Slap, 0.07 xG5–0
  6. P3 16:35CGYRyan StromeAssists: Yegor Sharangovich, Connor Zary · Wrist, 0.04 xG5–1
  7. P3 17:01SEAKaapo KakkoAssists: Jared McCann, Matty Beniers · Poke, 0.11 xG6–1
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 9:04CGYMatvei Gridin: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:38SEAJosh Mahura: Cross checking2 min
  3. P1 0:00CGYMartin Pospisil: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 4:32CGYJoel Farabee: Holding2 min
  5. P2 7:37CGYKevin Bahl: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 7:37SEAJacob Melanson: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 8:27CGYJoel Farabee: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 16:33CGYAdam Klapka: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win53% to win
← SEA attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Stephenson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEACGY
32Shots on goal25
3.9Expected goals2.5
59Shot attempts64
29Faceoffs won31
5Power plays1
4Penalty minutes12
20Hits24
20Blocked shots9
14Giveaways18
8Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestEberle – Stephenson – McMann8:27

    xG 1.32–0.31 (81%)attempts 13–5goals 1–0

  2. Winterton – Wright – Catton9:50

    xG 0.65–0.31 (68%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  3. McCann – Kakko – Beniers9:30

    xG 0.28–0.25 (53%)attempts 7–7goals 2–0

  4. Gaudreau – Douglas – Melanson4:11

    xG 0.23–0.21 (53%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMontour – Evans15:28

    xG 1.25–0.39 (76%)attempts 19–14goals 2–0

  2. Larsson – Dunn13:54

    xG 0.96–0.56 (63%)attempts 14–17goals 1–0

  3. Lindgren – Mahura11:44

    xG 0.53–0.99 (35%)attempts 8–17goals 2–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestFrost – Coronato – Gridin9:31

    xG 0.76–0.68 (53%)attempts 16–11goals 0–1

  2. Backlund – Farabee – Honzek10:03

    xG 0.60–0.56 (52%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

  3. Strome – Sharangovich – Zary10:54

    xG 0.63–0.63 (50%)attempts 14–8goals 1–2

  4. Pospisil – Klapka – Tsyplakov9:06

    xG 0.17–0.32 (36%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKuznetsov – Parekh2:15

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Bahl – Nemec14:15

    xG 0.75–0.94 (44%)attempts 14–14goals 0–0

  3. Middleton – Parekh12:42

    xG 0.67–0.87 (43%)attempts 14–11goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.5 xGSEA 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #53 of 65 this seasonSwing 0.58 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 72% of the time.

CGY winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).