Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 4, 2026·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Calgary Flames 1, Seattle Kraken 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 52% of the time.

SEA winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY011010112133
SEA3828111627

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:22SEABerkly CattonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:40SEAMackie SamoskevichGWGAssists: Brandon Montour, Ryker Evans · Backhand, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P1 7:40SEABobby McMannAssists: Chandler Stephenson · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–3
  4. P2 11:58SEAShane WrightAssists: Berkly Catton, Vince Dunn · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–4
  5. P2 19:34SEAMackie SamoskevichAssists: Matty Beniers, Jared McCann · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–5
  6. P3 14:25CGYMorgan FrostPPAssists: Matvei Gridin, Joel Farabee · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–5
  7. P3 15:04SEAJordan EberleAssists: Chandler Stephenson, Brandon Montour · Snap, 0.07 xG1–6
Penalties (3)
  1. P1 8:11SEAMackie Samoskevich: High sticking2 min
  2. P3 13:33SEAVille Ottavainen: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P3 0:00SEARyan Lindgren: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
47% to win53% to win
← CGY attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Beniers won the faceoff against Backlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYSEA
33Shots on goal27
2.7Expected goals2.6
83Shot attempts53
29Faceoffs won32
2Power plays0
0Penalty minutes6
29Hits21
7Blocked shots22
14Giveaways20
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestPospisil – Klapka – Tsyplakov6:22

    xG 0.46–0.31 (60%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

  2. Backlund – Farabee – Gridin10:06

    xG 0.68–0.54 (56%)attempts 12–16goals 0–2

  3. Strome – Pospisil – Honzek5:01

    xG 0.20–0.08 (71%)attempts 6–2goals 0–1

  4. Backlund – Farabee – Coronato2:07

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMiddleton – Parekh14:46

    xG 0.87–0.53 (62%)attempts 18–12goals 0–0

  2. Whitecloud – Bahl16:24

    xG 0.55–0.61 (47%)attempts 15–14goals 0–2

  3. Kuznetsov – Nemec18:00

    xG 0.64–1.06 (37%)attempts 28–19goals 0–2

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestKakko – Wright – Catton11:47

    xG 0.72–0.41 (64%)attempts 13–18goals 2–0

  2. Eberle – Stephenson – McMann12:51

    xG 0.62–0.42 (60%)attempts 13–19goals 2–0

  3. McCann – Beniers – Samoskevich13:21

    xG 0.40–0.35 (53%)attempts 10–12goals 2–0

  4. Gaudreau – Samoskevich – Winterton2:33

    xG 0.12–0.16 (43%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMontour – Evans21:55

    xG 1.19–0.43 (74%)attempts 21–18goals 2–0

  2. Lindgren – Ottavainen14:59

    xG 0.70–0.64 (52%)attempts 13–18goals 1–0

  3. Larsson – Dunn17:38

    xG 0.62–1.10 (36%)attempts 17–36goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.6 xGCGY 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEACGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #44 of 52 this seasonSwing 0.49 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 52% of the time.

SEA winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).