Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 6, 2026·Prudential Center, Newark

Utah Mammoth 5, New Jersey Devils 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Utah Mammoth win this game 69% of the time.

NJD winsUTA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
UTA1831419531
NJD111110112333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:57UTAClayton KellerPPAssists: Mikhail Sergachev, Logan Cooley · Slap, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:23NJDLuke EvangelistaPPAssists: Jack Hughes, Jesper Bratt · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:42UTAMacKenzie WeegarAssists: Anders Lee, Mikhail Sergachev · Backhand, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:31NJDLuke EvangelistaAssists: Timo Meier · Tip-in, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:05UTANick SchmaltzPPAssists: Dylan Guenther, Mikhail Sergachev · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:03UTALawson CrouseGWGAssists: Barrett Hayton, Nick Schmaltz · Tip-in, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P3 9:49NJDJesper BoqvistAssists: Dougie Hamilton, Declan Chisholm · Backhand, 0.09 xG4–3
  8. P3 16:52UTAVincent TrocheckAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Clayton Keller · Wrist, 0.25 xG5–3
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:10NJDTimo Meier: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 4:11UTADmitri Simashev: Cross checking2 min
  3. P1 7:12NJDBrenden Dillon: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 11:37UTAMacKenzie Weegar: Roughing2 min · PPG
  5. P1 12:05UTALawson Crouse: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 10:50NJDTimo Meier: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 15:59UTAMacKenzie Weegar: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 5:36NJDBrenden Dillon: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 5:36NJDBrenden Dillon: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 5:36UTAJack McBain: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 18:46UTAMacKenzie Weegar: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

UTA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NJD
47% to win53% to win
← UTA attackNJD attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hischier won the faceoff against Hayton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

UTANJD
31Shots on goal33
3.9Expected goals2.7
63Shot attempts66
36Faceoffs won34
4Power plays5
15Penalty minutes13
24Hits10
21Blocked shots14
24Giveaways22
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Utah Mammoth

Forward lines

  1. bestTrocheck – Schmaltz – Keller8:19

    xG 0.46–0.30 (60%)attempts 8–5goals 1–1

  2. Lee – Guenther – Cooley7:44

    xG 0.33–0.21 (62%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  3. Stenlund – Carcone – But8:35

    xG 0.22–0.20 (52%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  4. Crouse – Hayton – McBain7:46

    xG 0.16–0.49 (25%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMarino – Simashev4:27

    xG 0.26–0.02 (93%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  2. Schmidt – Weegar3:23

    xG 0.31–0.18 (64%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  3. Weegar – Sergachev5:38

    xG 0.48–0.36 (57%)attempts 11–7goals 1–1

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestMantha – Rodrigues – Mercer2:18

    xG 0.17–0.08 (67%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  2. Meier – Hischier – Evangelista10:41

    xG 0.27–0.27 (50%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  3. Bratt – Hughes – Gritsyuk3:46

    xG 0.13–0.13 (50%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Mantha – Bratt – Hughes5:52

    xG 0.42–0.43 (49%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamilton – Chisholm4:20

    xG 0.31–0.02 (93%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  2. Pesce – Hughes16:25

    xG 0.73–0.65 (53%)attempts 23–15goals 1–1

  3. Dillon – Chisholm8:25

    xG 0.09–0.21 (29%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NJD 2.7 xGUTA 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NJDUTA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it UTA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #15 of 52 this seasonSwing 1.74 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
UTA 100%5050%50NJD 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Utah Mammoth win this game 69% of the time.

NJD winsUTA wins

Simulated goal difference (NJD − UTA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).