Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 10, 2026·TD Garden, Boston

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Boston Bruins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 84% of the time.

BOS winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI030517115
BOS112110310532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:21BOSPavel ZachaAssists: David Pastrnak · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 17:12BOSMason LohreiGWGAssists: JJ Peterka, Fraser Minten · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–2
  3. P3 1:55BOSMarat KhusnutdinovAssists: Fraser Minten, Will Borgen · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–3
  4. P3 6:32PHIPorter MartonePPAssists: David Jiricek, Denver Barkey · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P3 9:21BOSCasey MittelstadtAssists: Elias Lindholm, James Hagens · Wrist, 0.26 xG1–4
  6. P3 15:59BOSFraser MintenAssists: JJ Peterka, Hampus Lindholm · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 9:24BOSPavel Zacha: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 6:55PHINoel Acciari: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P2 18:55BOSConnor Clifton: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 19:12PHITyson Foerster: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 6:16BOSWill Borgen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 18:44PHIPorter Martone: Interference2 min
  7. P3 18:44BOSFraser Minten: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 18:44BOSFraser Minten: Misconduct10 min
  9. P3 18:44PHIPorter Martone: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
47% to win53% to win
← PHI attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Lindholm
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIBOS
15Shots on goal32
1.3Expected goals3.3
37Shot attempts64
22Faceoffs won27
3Power plays2
16Penalty minutes18
21Hits25
18Blocked shots9
22Giveaways13
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCates – Barkey – Martone5:06

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Cates – Zegras – Martone3:07

    xG 0.10–0.05 (66%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Wilson – Bunting – Acciari8:34

    xG 0.05–0.14 (25%)attempts 3–7goals 0–1

  4. Couturier – Tippett – Michkov10:06

    xG 0.36–0.69 (34%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Seeler – Grans2:48

    xG 0.19–0.17 (53%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  2. Seeler – Drysdale2:00

    xG 0.00–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Sanheim – Grans2:18

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestLindholm – Mittelstadt – Hagens10:46

    xG 1.26–0.11 (92%)attempts 17–5goals 1–0

  2. Peterka – Khusnutdinov – Minten9:16

    xG 0.90–0.15 (86%)attempts 13–5goals 3–0

  3. Pastrnak – Zacha – Geekie13:27

    xG 0.78–0.17 (82%)attempts 18–8goals 0–0

  4. Jeannot – Kastelic – Poitras10:01

    xG 0.15–0.46 (25%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Zadorov18:17

    xG 1.18–0.30 (80%)attempts 27–10goals 0–0

  2. Lohrei – Brunet13:56

    xG 1.03–0.40 (72%)attempts 16–9goals 2–0

  3. Lindholm – Borgen15:53

    xG 0.85–0.28 (75%)attempts 15–9goals 3–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.3 xGPHI 1.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #63 of 86 this seasonSwing 0.69 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 84% of the time.

BOS winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).