Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #24

Craig Conroy

Age
55
Shoots
Right
Height
188 cm
Weight
88 kg
Born
Potsdam, USA
Draft
1990, round 6, #123 (MTL)

Career · 2009–10 to 2010–11

Games
81
Goals
5
Points
17
TOI per game
12:37
xGF% (5v5)
60.0%
Goals above expected
−0.2

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10CGY6331215−613:34525.8%04.2–
2010–11CGY18202−19:181118.2%00.960.0%
Total1 team8151217−712:37637.9%05.260.0%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.40.51020304050607080
9m10m11m12m13m14m15m1020304050607080Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2010–11 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

4th line

36th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

Extra / AHL
  • Goals /600.296th pct
  • Assists /600.7023rd pct
  • ixG /600.301st pct
  • Goals above expected−0.250th pct

Play-driving

1st line
  • xGF% (5v5)60.0%99th pct
  • CF% (5v5)54.7%90th pct
  • Relative xGF%+7.495th pct
  • Penalty diff /600.1857th pct

Usage

Extra / AHL
  • TOI per game12:3729th pct
  • PP time share0.8%6th pct
  • Offensive zone starts25.3%2nd pct
  • Quality of competition22.3%1st pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how). This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.

Most similar players this season

Needs a regular role to compare.

Faceoffs

How often Conroy wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2010–11, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 405+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

51.9%

554–514 · #65 of 179 regulars, 64th percentile

Against an average centre

52.5%

Opponents won 50.6% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.4% against them.

Wins above average

+26

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

13.2

1,068 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

56%169 · +0.446%101 · +0.954%168 · +2.064%22 · +2.658%33 · +2.453%47 · −0.255%62 · −0.655%185 · +4.846%281 · +0.7Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone49.5% 149–152
  • Neutral zone55.9% 186–147
  • Defensive zone50.5% 219–215

By strength

  • Even strength53.6% 415–359
  • Power play59.4% 19–13
  • Shorthanded45.9% 119–140

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +8 after a win, −21 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.6 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–1087951.5%52.0%
2010–1118953.4%54.4%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−0.2 goals above expected

0123451020304050607080Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−20−100+10+20+30+40