Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #20

Robert Lang

Age
55
Shoots
Right
Height
191 cm
Weight
98 kg
Born
Teplice, CZE
Draft
1990, round 7, #133 (LAK)

2009–10

Games
64
Goals
9
Points
29
TOI per game
15:05
xGF% (5v5)
–
Goals above expected
−1.0

Season

The regular-season line, by team for traded players.

2009–10PHX6492029−415:058410.7%1210.0–

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.8102030405060
12m13m14m15m16m17m18m102030405060Game

Player card

How this season compares with everyone else at the position, and the players with the most similar profile.

Scoring

  • Goals /600.56
  • Assists /601.24
  • ixG /600.62
  • Goals above expected−1.0

Play-driving

  • xGF% (5v5)–
  • CF% (5v5)–
  • Relative xGF%–
  • Penalty diff /60-0.44

Usage

  • TOI per game15:05
  • PP time share–
  • Offensive zone starts–
  • Quality of competition–

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.

Most similar players this season

Needs a regular role to compare.

Faceoffs

How often Lang wins the draw this season, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 202+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

51.3%

376–357 · #61 of 163 regulars, 63rd percentile

Against an average centre

52.3%

Opponents won 51.0% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.0% against them.

Wins above average

+17

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

11.5

733 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

46%110 · +0.449%142 · +2.451%209 · +1.868%28 · −2.850%32 · +1.256%27 · −1.253%36 · −0.650%40 · −0.156%109 · +0.8Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone51.9% 175–162
  • Neutral zone51.7% 120–112
  • Defensive zone49.4% 81–83

By strength

  • Even strength50.9% 298–288
  • Power play52.6% 71–64
  • Shorthanded62.5% 5–3

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +24 after a win, −1 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.0 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−1.0 goals above expected

0246810102030405060Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−100+10+20+30