Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
49
Shoots
Right
Height
188 cm
Weight
88 kg
Born
Tabor, CZE
Draft
1995, round 1, #10 (FLA)

Career · 2009–10 to 2013–14

Games
284
Goals
33
Points
88
TOI per game
14:44
xGF% (5v5)
44.2%
Goals above expected
−3.6

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10FLA76141832−717:2614010.0%412.7–
2010–11FLA5371421+216:33897.9%07.647.0%
2010–11ATL13011014:08200.0%02.253.3%
2010–11All teams6671522+216:051096.4%09.848.1%
2011–12DAL7341721−1614:17834.8%17.643.0%
2012–13ANA9404+213:081723.5%02.148.2%
2013–14CAR60459+310:38527.7%04.539.6%
Total5 teams284335588−1614:444018.2%536.644.2%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.811.250100150200250
5m10m15m20m50100150200250Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2013–14 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

4th line

18th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

4th line
  • Goals /600.4725th pct
  • Assists /600.7936th pct
  • ixG /600.5319th pct
  • Goals above expected−3.629th pct

Play-driving

Extra / AHL
  • xGF% (5v5)44.2%13th pct
  • CF% (5v5)46.1%20th pct
  • Relative xGF%−6.88th pct
  • Penalty diff /600.1153rd pct

Usage

3rd line
  • TOI per game14:4455th pct
  • PP time share2.9%21st pct
  • Offensive zone starts33.9%6th pct
  • Quality of competition24.0%47th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Dvorak wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2013–14, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 929+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

34.7%

26–49 · below the 929 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

35.0%

Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.

Wins above average

−11

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

1.3

75 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

0%5 · –33%3 · 0.043%14 · −0.3100%1 · –33%9 · 0.00%2 · –25%8 · +0.830%10 · +3.043%23 · +0.5Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone41.2% 7–10
  • Neutral zone24.0% 6–19
  • Defensive zone39.4% 13–20

By strength

  • Even strength32.1% 17–36
  • Power play66.7% 2–1
  • Shorthanded36.8% 7–12

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: 0 after a win, −16 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.1 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–101717.6%18.0%
2010–111936.8%37.7%
2011–122540.0%39.7%
2012–1320.0%-1.0%
2013–141250.0%50.8%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−3.6 goals above expected

01020304050100150200250Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60+80+100