- Age
- 49
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 185 cm
- Weight
- 93 kg
- Born
- Edmonton, CAN
- Draft
- 1996, round 8, #195 (EDM)
Career · 2009–10 to 2010–11
- Games
- 100
- Goals
- 11
- Points
- 24
- TOI per game
- 13:23
- xGF% (5v5)
- 43.5%
- Goals above expected
- +0.1
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2010–11 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
Extra / AHL
15th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
4th line- Goals /600.4921st pct
- Assists /600.5815th pct
- ixG /600.4910th pct
- Goals above expected+0.152nd pct
Play-driving
Extra / AHL- xGF% (5v5)43.5%12th pct
- CF% (5v5)45.6%13th pct
- Relative xGF%−10.94th pct
- Penalty diff /600.2261st pct
Usage
4th line- TOI per game13:2335th pct
- PP time share4.7%25th pct
- Offensive zone starts36.9%12th pct
- Quality of competition24.4%46th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Pisani wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2010–11, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 405+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
45.1%
37–45 · below the 405 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
46.1%
Opponents won 51.0% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.0% against them.
Wins above average
−3
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
2.8
82 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone46.7% 14–16
- Neutral zone57.1% 12–9
- Defensive zone35.5% 11–20
By strength
- Even strength47.0% 31–35
- Power play25.0% 1–3
- Shorthanded41.7% 5–7
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +14 after a win, −11 after a loss. Each win was worth 2.3 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Craig Conroy66.7% 4–2
- Andrew Cogliano0.0% 0–4
- Vernon Fiddler75.0% 3–1
- Saku Koivu50.0% 2–2
- Kyle Turris33.3% 1–2
- Jerred Smithson66.7% 2–1
- Nick Bonino66.7% 2–1
- Paul Stastny0.0% 0–2
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 16 | 18.8% | 20.4% |
| 2010–11 | 66 | 51.5% | 52.3% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
+0.1 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games